SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1267

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA, [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR]
ABHIJIT GANGOPADHYAY, ANIRUDDHA ROY, JJ.
The Union of India - Appellant
Versus
M/s Srishaila Constructions Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
FMAT(ARBAWARD) No.1 of 2023, IA No. CAN/1 of 2023
Decided On : 16-03-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. V.D. Sivabalan.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shipra Mandal.

IMPORTANT POINT
The Court has the power under section 36 sub-sections 1 and 3 of the Arbitration Act to direct the appellant to secure a sum with the court and grant a stay of the execution proceeding to prevent potential prejudice to the appellant during the appeal.

Headnote:

Arbitration Act - Appeal under section 37 - Stay of execution proceeding and deposit of sum - Appellant seeking setting aside of award - Court directs appellant to secure a sum of Rs.7,50,00,000.00 with the court and grants unconditional stay of execution proceeding for six weeks

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought setting aside of an award before the jurisdictional Civil Court. The jurisdictional Civil Court dismissed the setting aside application and ordered the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.7,86,88,850/- along with interest. The respondent had already put the award into execution before the same jurisdictional Civil Court and the execution proceeding was pending.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that if the execution proceeding proceeds during the pendency of the appeal, the appeal may become infructuous and the appellant would suffer prejudice. As a result, the Court directed the appellant to secure a sum of Rs.7,50,00,000.00 with the court and granted an unconditional stay of the execution proceeding for six weeks.

Issues: Setting aside of award, stay of execution proceeding, prejudice to appellant

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the potential prejudice to the appellant if the execution proceeding continued during the appeal. The Court exercised its power under section 36 sub-sections 1 and 3 of the Arbitration Act to direct the appellant to secure a sum with the court and granted a stay of the execution proceeding.

Final Decision: The appellant was directed to secure a sum of Rs.7,50,00,000.00 with the court and an unconditional stay of the execution proceeding was granted for six weeks. The appeal was admitted and expedited.

JUDGMENT :

This is an appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( for short the ‘Arbitration Act’). The appellant had suffered an Award. The appellant filed an application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act seeking setting aside of that award before the jurisdictional Civil Court, being Other Appeal No. 03 of 2022.

2. By the impugned judgment and order dated November 30, 2022, the said setting aside application was dismissed and the jurisdictional Civil Court had observed that, in terms of the majority award, the appellant was to pay a sum of Rs.7,86,88,850/-(Rupees seven crores eighty six lakhs eighty eight thousand eight hundred fifty only) along with interest.

3. Today, Ms.Shipra Mandal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, being the Award Holder, submitted that the respondent had already put the said award into execution before the same jurisdictional Civil Court and the execution proceeding is pending.

4. Mr. V.D.Sivabalan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that, unless the operation of the impugned order and consequently the award is stayed, the appellant will be seriously prejudiced, as the execution proceeding is going on and this appeal will also become infructuous. He further submitted that, the appellant has an excellent chance of success in this appeal as the order passed by the jurisdictional Civil Court dismissing the setting aside application cannot sustain in law.

5. Considering the rival contentions of the parties and considering the materials on record, this Court is of the view that, in the event, during the pendency of this appeal, if the execution proceeding proceeds, then, the appeal may become infructuous and the appellant would suffer prejudice.

6. For those reasons, the appellant is directed to secure a sum of Rs.7,50,00,000.00 (Rupees Seven crores fifty lakhs only), in terms of the provisions laid down under section 36 sub-sections 1 and 3 of the Arbitration Act, with the learned Registrar of this Court, positively within a period of six weeks from date.

7. For a period of six weeks from date, there shall be an unconditional stay of the execution proceeding, being Other Execution Case No. 1 of 2022 pending before the learned District Judge, at Port Blair.

8. In the event, the said amount is deposited, as directed above, then, the said execution case shall be remained stayed until this appeal is disposed of. In the event, the amount is not deposited, the stay granted by us today, shall stand vacated automatically without any reference to this Court immediately on the day six weeks elapses from today and the respondent shall be free to proceed with the execution proceeding without any fetter.

9. In the event, the said sum is deposited, as directed above, the learned Registrar shall deposit the said sum in an interest bearing fixed deposit account with a Nationalized Bank of his/her choice and shall file a report before the Court, when the matter shall be taken up next.

10. In the event, the deposit is made, as directed above, the execution proceeding and the award, in their entirety, shall remain stayed until disposal of this appeal.

11. The lower court record is directed to be brought in before this Court upon compliance of all the necessary formalities by the appellant within a period of four weeks from date. Upon receiving the lower court records, the Registry shall issue notice upon the parties so that the appellant can file paper books within two weeks from the date of receiving of such records. The appellant, in turn, shall file paper books in compliance of the rules within a further period of four weeks from date after such notice being received by them from the Registry. Copy of the paper books shall be furnished upon the respondent.

12. With the above directions, the stay application, being CAN/1/2023 stands disposed of. The appeal is admitted and expedited.

13. After compliance of the directions made above including service of paper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top