IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH, J.
Manirul Sk. – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
C.R.A. 612 of 2019
Decided On : 21-08-2024
Counterfeit - IPC - 489B, 489C - The court interpreted Sections 489B and 489C of the IPC, emphasizing the necessity of proving active trafficking or possession of counterfeit currency, leading to a conviction under Section 489C while acquitting under Section 489B due to charge deficiencies.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was arrested for possessing 71 pieces of counterfeit currency notes at a ferry ghat, attempting to use them as genuine. The police conducted a raid based on a tip-off, leading to the seizure of the notes from the appellant's possession.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution established the appellant's possession of counterfeit notes but failed to prove the charge of trafficking under Section 489B due to inadequate framing of charges, leading to an acquittal under that section.
Issues: Whether the appellant was guilty under Sections 489B and 489C of the IPC, particularly regarding the adequacy of the charges framed and the evidence of trafficking.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the language of the charge must enable the accused to understand the case against them. The absence of specific terms related to trafficking in the charge under Section 489B led to the appellant's acquittal under that section.
Result: The appeal is partly allowed; the conviction under Section 489B is overturned, while the conviction under Section 489C is upheld with modified sentencing.
JUDGMENT :
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) :
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 07.09.2019, 09.09.2019 and 11.09.2019 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 2nd Fast Track Court, Jangipur, Murshidabad, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1(1)2015 arising out of S.Sl. No. 150 of 2014 CIS No. 135/2014 wherein the learned Court was pleased to convict the appellant under Sections 489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him as follows :
(ii) For the offence punishable under Section 489C of the Indian Penal Code – Rigorous Imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, i.d. to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 months.
2. Samsherganj Police Station case no. 351 of 2013 dated 17.10.2013 was registered for investigation under Sections 489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of an information submitted by one Amit Bhakat, Sub-inspector of Police attached to Samsherganj police station with the Officer-in-charge, Samsherganj police station, Murshidabad. On 17.10.2013 at about 17.15 hrs. an information was received, that a person was suspiciously roaming at Dhuliyan Ferry Ghat area with Fake Indian Currency Notes and was attempting to use the same as genuine. So, an information was diarized vide Samsherganj Police Station GDE No. 788 dated 17.10.2013. A raiding team was constituted along with two constables namely, Sk. Yeasin Ali and Biswajit Purti along with Home Guard Tapas Das. The raiding team left the police station to work out the said information vide Samsherganj Police Station GDE No. 789 dated 17.10.2013 and M.C.C. No. 3320/13 dated 17.10.2013 with the police station vehicle bearing no. WB-58U/3214. At about 17.35 hrs. the raiding party reached at Dhuliyan Ferry Ghat and on being identified by the source found that the accused person was standing suspiciously at Dhuliyan Ferry Ghat but on seeing the police team he tried to flee away but was apprehended in front of four independent local witnesses. Two of the witnesses namely, Lutu Sk and Ashok Basak agreed to be witnesses and in their presence search of the person was conducted and a bundle containing 71 pieces of notes of Rs.500/- denomination wrapped in a black plastic carry packet was recovered from the exclusive possession of the accused which was concealed in the left side waist line of his wearing lungi. On being questioned the accused disclosed his identity and confessed that he had full knowledge about the notes which were forged and confessed that he came there to circulate the fake notes as genuine in the local market. The accused was involved in dealing, possessing and business of Fake Indian Currency Notes, as such in presence of the witnesses the Fake Indian Currency Notes were seized as alamat of the case, the details whereof were incorporated in the seizure list which were signed by the witnesses as also the accused person. The entire process of the search, seizure and labelling continued from 17.45 hrs. to 19.15 hrs. and then the accused was arrested. The complainant thereafter prayed for a specific case being registered under Sections 489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code against the accused namely, Manirul Sk. for being investigated.
3. After the registration of Samsherganj Police Station case no. 351 of 2013 dated 17.10.2013, Sub-inspector Santanu Mukherjee (PW8) of the said police station was endorsed to investigate the case. The Investigating officer visited the place of occurrence, prepared rough sketch map along with index, examined the available witnesses under Section 161 of Code of Criminal Procedure, sent the seized FICN to the Expert and on receipt of the Expert’s opinion submitted charge-sheet before the Jurisdictional Court under Sections 489B/489C of the Indian Pena
K. Hasim v. State of Tamil Nadu
Parakh Foods Limited v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008) 4 SCC 584
The conflicting interpretations of 'possession' and 'otherwise traffics in' in different judgments led the court to refer the issues to a Larger Bench for decision.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the failure to reframe the charges and give the appellants an opportunity to respond to the charges of trafficking or transportation of counte....
Possession of forged or counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes - Conviction modified - Prosecution prove charges under S. 489C of IPC. As far as charges of S. 489B of IPC prosecution could neither ....
Possession of counterfeit currency alone does not warrant conviction under IPC Section 489A; trafficking established through possession leads to conviction under Sections 489B and 489C.
Prosecution must prove both knowledge and intent regarding the possession of forged currency; mere possession is insufficient for conviction under guiding statutes.
The judgment clarifies that mere possession of counterfeit currency does not equate to being a mastermind, and the role of the accused must be considered in sentencing.
Mens rea is essential for conviction under IPC Sections 489B and 489C; mere possession of a counterfeit note without intent or knowledge does not constitute an offense.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.