RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Soumendranath Mia – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
1. The writ petitioner is aggrieved due to the inaction on the part of the respondent District Inspector of Schools (Secondary Education), Birbhum/respondent No.3 as well as the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education/respondent No.10, against whom he has alleged gross inaction as regards taking necessary steps pursuant to his letter dated July 3, 2018.
2. In short, the factual background of the case is as follows:-that after joining in the school in the year 2011, the writ petitioner was assigned with the duty of the teacher-in-charge with effect from October, 2017. During that period and allegedly as a result of his protest against the illegal activities of the Managing Committee, rift and discordance had developed between him and the Managing Committee. As a result, the petitioner submitted resignation on April 28, 2018 to the Secretary, Managing Committee of the school. There he narrated about him being forcefully restrained to join in duties, having been subjected to threat and dire consequences, due to his protesting the unlawful activities of the Managing Committee of the school. He has named the respondents No. 13 and 14 as the main perpetrato
Kapila Hingorani vs State of Bihar reported in (2003) 6 SCC 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.