Back
RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Goutam Roy Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.) :
1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, praying for a direction upon the respondent no.4 to afford the petitioner with the benefits of second Carrier Advancement Scheme (in short, “CAS”) with effect from February, 2013 in terms of the Memo No. 3015-F dated 13th March, 2001.
2. The petitioner is an employee of the respondent no.2 (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”) and had joined the service of the Corporation sometimes in the month of February, 1997 as a clerk. It is the petitioner’s case that after the Government of West Bengal had taken a decision to implement CAS in the Corporation, the OSD and Ex Officio Deputy Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Transport Department, by letter no. 2676-WT 7T/18/2005 dated 14th August, 2007 had called upon the Managing Director of the Corporation to implement CAS in the Corporation with effect from 1st August, 2007 in terms of the Memo No. 7552(80)F dated 4th September, 2000. Pursuant to and in terms of the aforesaid, the Corporation by following the Memo No. 3015-F dated 13th March, 2001, which contains elaborate guidelines for implementation of CAS, had awarded its emp
Employees retired before 01.01.2011 are entitled to revised pay benefits retroactively from 01.01.2006 on notional basis, addressing inequity in pension distribution.
Minor penalties like censure cannot permanently bar career advancement or financial benefits under service regulations, and employees must be compensated for withheld entitlements post-penalty.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellants were entitled to the benefits of the Pension Regulations of 2002, and the denial of rights was not based on their failure to ex....
The office memorandum dated 26.11.2008 is binding on the Corporation and constitutes an agreement under Section 4(5) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
The High Court can issue a writ of mandamus to compel the performance in a proper and lawful manner of the discretion conferred upon the government or a public authority, and in a proper case, in ord....
The court established that casual/daily rated workers engaged prior to a specified date are entitled to benefits under government memoranda, regardless of their engagement against sanctioned posts.
Promotional benefits must be granted from the actual date of promotion, not from the date of notification, ensuring equal treatment for similarly situated employees.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
