CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.
Md. Khurshid Alam - Petitioner
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A 31708 of 2014
Decided On : 21-05-2024
(A) Right to Information Act, 2005 - Correction of date of birth - The petitioner challenged the rejection of his application for correction of date of birth and name of father in the admit card - The court held that the delay of twenty-eight years in filing the application is unreasonable and cannot be condoned. (Paras 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)
(B) Administrative Procedure - The correction of date of birth is subject to the procedure and period prescribed by the concerned department, and cannot be claimed as a matter of right. (Paras 10, 11)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought correction of his date of birth from 15.01.1965 to 10.01.1967, which was incorrectly recorded in his admit card. Despite repeated representations, the application was rejected due to procedural delays.
Findings of Court:
The court found the rejection of the petitioner's request valid, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prescribed procedures and timelines.
Issues: The main issues were the reasonableness of the delay in filing the application and the authority of the respondent to reject the request based on procedural grounds.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the correction of date of birth is not an absolute right and must comply with the established procedures and timelines.
Result: The writ application is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
The instant writ petition is preferred by one Md Khurshid Alam herein the writ petitioner challenging the letter dated 17.09.2013 by Deputy Secretary (Academic) and S P.I.O (HQ) dismissing application for correction of date of birth and name of father of the petitioner.
2. The facts of the case are that petitioner who appeared for Madhyamik (Secondary) Examination under West Bengal Board of Secondary Education in 1982 was issued an admit card recording his date of birth as 15.01.1965 instead of 10.01.1967. The name of the petitioner's father was incorrectly recorded as "Md Moin Ansari" instead of "Md Moin". The petitioner came to know about such discrepancies in his admit card in 2010.
3. The petitioner on 13.04.2010 made a representation to the Secretary, West Bengal Board of Secondary Education herein respondent No.1 by filing an application form for rectification of date of birth and name of father which was not taken into consideration. Thereafter an application under The Right to Information Act, 2005 was filed on 20.11.2012 seeking information regarding order passed in response to application dated 13.04.2010.
4. The petitioner's prayer for correction of the aforesaid particulars in the admit card was rejected by letter dated 17.09.2013 under Memo No. Inf/163/13 stating "In response to the aforesaid application the relevant department has informed that as the Date of Birth denotes underage at the time of admission in Class V, that has been stated to be the cause of rejection of the prayer of Date of Birth correction"
Thus, aggrieved by the preceding letter dated 17.09.2013 by Deputy Secretary (Academic) and S P.I.O (HQ), the present writ petition lies.
5. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per Admission Register of Kendwa High School, the date of birth of the petitioner was 10.01.1967. However, the respondent authorities committed a clerical mistake in the Madhyamik admit card of the petitioner by recording an incorrect date of birth and name of father. Despite repeated representations made on 13.04.2010 and 20.11.2012 to correct the said mistakes, the respondent authorities continued to rely upon a fictious date of birth supplied by the school authority without consulting the petitioner.
6. The petitioner who was born in the year 1967 was aged about nine years at the time of admission in Class V in 1976 and fifteen years at the time of Madhyamik examinations in 1982. The age once recorded in the Transfer Certificate of the previous school cannot be altered. The reason that the petitioner was underage thereby rejecting the application for correction of date of birth of the petitioner by the respondent authority is arbitrary and illegal.
7. The Learned Counsel for the respondent authorities submit that petitioner at the time of presenting his application for alteration of date of birth and name of father failed to produce Birth Registration Certificate or Voter's Identity Card or other relevant and valid documents to prove his actual date of birth. Entry of date of birth in the Admission Register of school cannot provide irrefutable conclusive proof as to date of birth and name of the father of the petitioner.
8. It is further submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge of the clerical error in the admit card since 1982 and in 2010, no sufficient cause was given by him to explain the inordinate delay in preferring an application for rectification of date of birth. By Circular No. Age/ G/I/October/77 published by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education on 03.10.1997, the claim of the petitioner is barred by the following provision :
"8. If in spite of all possible precautions, any clerical error (including the case of any absurd date of birth) occurs, the fact should be reported to the Board either by the Headmasters Headmistress or by the legal guardian of the pupil through the Headmaster/Headmistress of the school for necessary correction in the entry of dat
AI
The correction of date of birth in official records is subject to procedural requirements and cannot be claimed as a matter of right, especially after unreasonable delays.
The correction of date of birth in official records requires irrefutable proof, and delays in seeking such corrections can lead to dismissal of the application.
A government servant's date of birth can be corrected if the request is made within five years and does not affect eligibility for examinations, supported by a valid Birth Certificate.
The court's decision was based on the principle that in cases where a petitioner provides supporting documents for a requested correction and approaches the department in a timely manner, it is in th....
Belated applications for corrections can be entertained on merit despite regulatory time constraints.
The court elucidated that corrections in service records require thorough consideration of prior approvals and the petitioner's history, overriding claims of procedural delays by the government.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.