SHAMPA SARKAR
Mohan Bhattachajee – Appellant
Versus
Shibani Bhattacharjee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
The revisional application is disposed of upon hearing the petitioner and the plaintiffs/opposite party Nos.1 to 4. The revisional application deals with the amendment of the written statement. The application for amendment was contested in the learned court only by the plaintiffs. Service upon the other opposite parties is dispensed with.
2. By an order dated July 22, 2022 passed in Title Suit No.126 of 2015, the court rejected the application for amendment of the written statement by which the defendant No.1 wanted to incorporate certain factual aspects with regard to the defence case and also introduce a counterclaim with certain prayers. The learned court rejected the application for amendment on the ground that under the guise of amendment, the defendant No.1 was praying for declaratory reliefs which were within the domain of the thika controller. Moreover, such amendment would change the nature and character of the suit.
3. Mr.Ghosal, learned advocate for the defendant No.1/petitioner submits that the order impugned suffers from the following irregularities:
Ashok Kumar Kalra vs Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri and Ors.
Revajeetu Builders and Develpers vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and Ors. reported in 2009(10) SCC 84
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and others vs. K.K. Modi and others reported in AIR 2006 SC 1647
Amendments to written statements are permissible to clarify defenses but must not change the suit's nature; counterclaims must be timely filed before issues are framed.
Point of Law : Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure deals with amendment of pleadings which provides that the court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend ....
Categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by way of an amendment.
Amendments to pleadings should not be allowed if they fundamentally change the nature and character of the case and if a fresh suit on the amended claims would be barred by limitation. Admissions in ....
Amendment of pleadings after the commencement of the trial is not permissible unless the party can show that in spite of due diligence, the matter could not have been raised before the commencement o....
Counter-claims must be filed independently and cannot be included in an amendment application to a written statement.
Amendments to written statements must not cause severe prejudice to the opposing party, especially when sought after a party's death.
Amendment of written statements post-trial commencement is not permissible if it contradicts prior admissions regarding landlord-tenant relationships.
The court emphasized the importance of due diligence and bona fide, legitimate, and necessary amendments, while rejecting mala fide, worthless, and dishonest amendments.
The court upheld a liberal approach to amendments in pleadings, allowing inconsistencies unless they cause prejudice, emphasizing the need for effective adjudication of the real issues.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.