SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1480

TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE
Arun Kumar Mullick – Appellant
Versus
Debabrata Seal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Sourav Sen, Mr. Soumen Das.

Table of Content
1. overview of the probate application and objections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's analysis regarding the execution and authenticity of the will. (Para 4 , 5 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. arguments presented by the appellants regarding the will's validity. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. affirmation of the lower court's judgment. (Para 19)
5. final decision and directions. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)

The present appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment dated 27th March, 2018 passed by the learned 3rd Judge, City Civil Court at Calcutta in O.C. Case No.22 of 2014 dismissing the application for grant of probate of the Will made and published by one Chintamoni Mullick, in a contentious cause.

2. The application for grant of probate accompanied by an affidavit of assets was filed by Arun Kumar Mullick (in short, Arun) and by one Gour Gopal Mullick (in short, Gour) being the appellants herein stating inter alia that one Chintamoni Mullick (in short, Chintamoni) was the owner of the said assets and prior to his death on 13th December, 2002, he voluntarily executed a deed of Will on 11th December, 2002 and the same was notarized on the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top