ARIJIT BANERJEE, APURBA SINHA RAY
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shoma Roy Sarkar Banerjee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.
In Re: IA No. CAN/4/2022
1. This is an application for modification of an order dated January 7, 2014, passed in this second appeal. By that order, a Coordinate Bench admitted the appeal on the questions of law recorded in the order and further directed “stay of operation of the decree provided the appellant would continue to pay Rs. 50,000/- per month as occupation charges for the suit premises commencing from January, 2013, until further order.” There was also a direction for payment of the arrear amount in 12 equal monthly instalments. We are told that the arrear amount has been paid.
2. The material facts of the case in so far as the same are relevant for the present purpose, are that the respondents/applicants are the owners of land measuring about 31.09 kathas on Hill Cart Road in Siliguri. The predecessor in interest of the first applicant along with other owners of the land entered into a lease agreement Dated March 1, 1962, with one Standard Vacuum Oil Company for a period of 10 years with an option for renewal of the lease for a further period of ten years, in respect of the said land. In 1974, Standard Vacuum Oil Company came to be known as ESS
Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. v. Federal Motors (P) Ltd. (2005) 1 SCC 705
Marshall Sons & Co. (I) Ltd. v. Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd. & Anr. (1999) 2 SCC 325
Martin and Harris Private Limited & Anr. v. Rajendra Mehta & Ors. (2022) 8 SCC 527
State of Maharashtra vs. Super Max International Pvt. Ltd. and others
Appellate courts have the authority to set reasonable terms for occupational charges during stays on eviction orders, considering current market values.
Appellate courts have discretion in awarding stay conditions but cannot modify final orders unless new substantial evidence justifies such action; past decisions are binding under the principle of re....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of equitable principles and consideration of prevailing market rates to determine the reasonableness of the occupational charge for....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretionary power of the court to determine the quantum of occupational charge based on the nature, location, and value of the property, and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the jurisdiction to direct payment of admitted rent or usage charges during the pendency of a suit, and the landlord is entitled....
Tenant cannot claim himself/herself to be tenant qua the premises in question after passing of eviction order and courts after passing of eviction order can always put the tenant of premises to terms....
Occupants in eviction suits are obligated to pay occupation charges during the pendency of the suit, and courts must provide reasoned orders on such applications.
The court established that occupational charges must be reasonable and based on a fair assessment of the property, especially in cases involving ex-parte decrees.
The tenant must compensate the landlords for the loss occasioned by the stay granted by the Court on the execution of the eviction order, and the best indicator for fixing the compensation payable by....
The main legal point established is that a party cannot evade its liability to pay occupation charges to protect its possession over the subject property, and the determination of such charges should....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.