SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 1545

AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Narayan Gopal Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Kalyani Sarkar – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Tanmay Mukherjee, Mr. Diptimoy Talukder and Mr. Abhiraj Tarafdar, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J. - Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. In spite of service, opposite parties are not represented.

2. The present revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against order No. 13 dated 6th December, 2018 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bongaon, 24-Parganas (North) in Title Suit No. 134 of 2015.

3. Petitioner states that the petitioner as plaintiff filed aforesaid suit, inter alia, praying for a decree of permanent injunction against the defendants / opposite parties. The defendants/opposite parties herein entered appearance and filed written statement.

4. It is alleged that during pendency of the said suit plaintiff/petitioner was illegally dispossessed from the suit property. Accordingly, the petitioner/plaintiff filed an application under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a prayer for amendment of the plaint as per the schedule of the said application. The defendants / opposite parties filed written objection against the said application.

5. Learned Court below by the impugned order No. 13 dated 6th December, 2018 was pleased to reject th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top