SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Cal) 435

WALMSLEY, SUHRAWARDY, NEWBOULD, C. C. GHOSE, B. B. GHOSE
Becharam Choudhuri – Appellant
Versus
Purna Chandra Chatterji – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Walmsley, J. - These appeals are preferred by the defendants and they arise from suits brought by the landlord for rent and for enhancement of the existing rents. The landlord's claim was made u/s 7 of the Bengal Tenancy Act.

2. In the record-of-rights the tenures were described as permanent, but gar mokurari. The defendants asserted that the latter part of the entry was erroneous and that their rents were really fixed.

3. After the publication of the record-of-rights the landlord presented an application u/s 105 of the Tenancy Act for settlement of a fair rent on these tenures: But he withdrew the application and obtained from the Settlement Officer an order permitting him to institute civil suits for the same purpose.

4. Both the Courts below have held that Section 109 of the Tenancy Act does not bar the suits, on the ground that the application u/s 105 was withdrawn with permission to bring civil suits. On the merits, however, they disagreed, that is so far as the claim for enhancement is concerned. The first Court found that the defendants were entitled to a presumption u/s 50 of the Act, while the appellate Court held that the defendants could not claim the benefit of tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top