FRANCIS W. MACLEAN, PRINSEP, HARINGTON, GHOSE, BRETT
Arip Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Ratan Mandal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Francis W. Maclean, C.J. - In our opinion, irrespective of custom or local usage, the heir of an under-raiyat under an annual holding as entitled, on the death of the under-raiyat, to remain in possession of the land, until the end of the agricultural year, for the purpose, if the land has been sublet, of realising the rent which might accrue during the year, or if not sublet, for the purpose of tending and gathering in the crops. In this case the suit was not brought until after the expiration of the then agricultural year. Although there was a claim for mesne profits, there is no evidence whatever to show that there wore any, or that there were any crops which had been sown by the plaintiff's predecessor. The result, therefore, is that there is nothing which he can claim in this suit; and the suit must be dismissed.
2. The appellant is entitled to his costs in the two lower Courts, but to no costs of this Appeal.
Prinsep, J.
3. I am of the same opinion.
Ghose, J.
4. I agree.
Harington, J.
5. I agree.
Brett, J.
6. I agree.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.