SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1946 Supreme(Cal) 122

Kalachand Chunder – Appellant
Versus
Fatehdin – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.R. Das, J. - The suit in which this application has been made is a partition suit filed by one Kalachand Chunder, an attorney of this Court for partition of premises No. 7 Murali Dhar Sen Lane.

2. On 22nd December 1941, a preliminary decree was passed in this suit declaring the shares of the parties in the property and appointing Mr. T. Chatterjee as the Commissioner of partition and Mr. Salehjee as the receiver. By this decree it was provided, inter alia, that in the event of the said Commissioner of partition finding that the said premises could not be conveniently and reasonably partitioned by metes and bounds the Commissioner of partition should sell the same by private treaty or by public auction to the best purchaser provided the Commissioner of partition considered that a sufficient bid had been offered. The Commissioner of partition was directed to fix a reserve price and was given liberty to issue advertisements for sale. Liberty was also given to the parties to bid at the sale.

3. On 3rd March 1944, Mr. T. Chatterjee and Mr. Salehjee were by an order of Court discharged and Mr. A.C. Gupta was appointed the receiver and Commissioner of partition on the same remuner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top