SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1911 Supreme(Cal) 417

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Fletcher, J.
Peary Mohan Das - Appellant
Versus
D. Weston & Ors. - Respondent
Decided On : 07-08-1911

Headnote:

Conspiracy - Damages - Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 5 and 6 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Sections 154, 164, 167, 172, 344, 364, 552 - Indian Limitation Act, 1908, Article 86 - - Summary - The court found that the defendants, including the District Magistrate, conspired to arrest the plaintiff to pressure his son into confessing to a bomb conspiracy. The court analyzed the evidence, including the informer's reports, confessions, and witness testimonies, finding them unreliable and fabricated. The court held that the defendants' actions were not justified under the Explosive Substances Act, as the plaintiff was not in possession of the bomb and the arrest was not based on reasonable suspicion. The court also found that the defendants violated various provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, including the recording of first information, investigation diaries, and confessions. The court awarded damages to the plaintiff for the harm caused by the conspiracy and the unlawful arrest.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff was arrested in connection with an alleged bomb conspiracy. The defendants, including the District Magistrate, claimed that the arrest was based on reasonable suspicion that the plaintiff was involved in the conspiracy. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants conspired to arrest him to pressure his son into confessing to the conspiracy.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the defendants conspired to arrest the plaintiff to pressure his son into confessing to the bomb conspiracy. The court found the evidence presented by the defendants, including the informer's reports and confessions, to be unreliable and fabricated. The court held that the defendants' actions were not justified under the Explosive Substances Act, as the plaintiff was not in possession of the bomb and the arrest was not based on reasonable suspicion. The court also found that the defendants violated various provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, including the recording of first information, investigation diaries, and confessions.

Issues: The main issues were whether the defendants conspired to injure the plaintiff, whether they acted maliciously or illegally in searching his house, arresting him, and prosecuting him, and whether the suit was barred by limitation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of conspiracy and malicious prosecution, finding that the defendants' actions were not justified under the Explosive Substances Act and that they violated various provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court also held that the suit was not barred by limitation.

Final Decision: The court found in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendants conspired to injure him and awarded damages for the harm caused by the conspiracy and the unlawful arrest.

JUDGMENT

Fletcher, J. - This is a suit to recover damages resulting from an alleged conspiracy.

2. The present suit is one of five analogous suits brought against the present defendants arising out of a criminal case which was commonly known as the Midnapore Bomb conspiracy Case. The Emperor v. Santosh Chunder Dass 13 C.W.N. 861 : 9 C.L.J. 663 : 2 Ind. Cas. 681 : 10 Cri.L.J. 125.

3. The plaintiff, Peary Mohan Das, is about 68 years of age. He appeared to me to be older. He was formerly in Government service as a Sub-Registrar of deeds--but in the year 1884 his services were dispensed with owing to his having returned to the person presenting the same a deed which was believed to be forged.

4. Since the year 1881 the plaintiff has lived in Midnapore where ho appears to be held in respect; and esteem.

5. The first defendant, Mr. Donald Weston, is a member of the Indian Civil Service and was formerly District Magistrate and Collector of Midnapore. The second defendant, Moulvi Mazaharul Huq, is a Deputy Superintendent in the Bengal Police, Having been employed for sometime in the Criminal Investigation Department, towards the end of 1907, he was Appointed as Deputy Superintendent of Police at Mindnapore. The third defendant, Babu Lal Mohun Guha, is an Inspector in the Bengal Police, and in the year 1908 was Inspector of Police at Mindnapore.

6. The plaintiff's wife is Basanta Kumari. Basanta, who is old and infirm, is mother's sister (mashi) to Dr. Rash Behari Cthose, C.S.I., one of the leading Vakils of this Court.

7. The plaintiff has three sons, Ashutosh, Santosh Chandra and Paritosh.

8. In the early part of the year 1908, his household consisted of himself, his wife, his three sons, a grandson (daughter's son) Jotindra Nath Sen, a cook, a maid servant and a boy servant, Bonomali Das. In addition to these there were the young ladies in the zenana. On the 14th January 1908, Santosh who had obtained the appointment of a probationary Sub-Inspector in the Bengal Police went to the Police Training College at Ranchi.

9. On the 3rd May the plaintiff's house and six other houses at Midnapore were searched by the Police but nothing incriminatory was found. What the reason for this search was or from whom the information emanated which led to the Bearoh we do not know, but apparently it had been intended by the authorities that these searches should take place simultaneously with the searches in Calcutta in connection with the Alipore Conspiracy.

10. On the night of the 13th of June Santosh returned to his father's house owing to the vacation at Ranchi. On the 3rd July the plaintiff's son Ashutosh, who was a mail clerk in the Midnapore Post Office, was transferred on six hours' notice from Midanpore to Muzufferpore.

11. On the night of the 7th July, the Moulvi applied for search-warrants to search the plaintiff's house and Hanumanjee'a temple of which one Surendra Nath Mookerjee was the pujari.

12. The application for the search-warrants was made to Mr. Nelson, late at night. On the morning of the 8th July, the search of the plaintiff's house was conducted by the Moulvi and Lal Mohun, assisted by others of the Police--the house being surrounded by the Military Police Almost at the end of the search a bomb was discovered in the plaintiff's baitakhannah and Santosh was arrested. The search party was in charge of Mr. Brett, the Assistant Superintendent of Police.

13. The bomb was subsequently taken to Mr. Weston and afterwards opened by Captain (now Major) Weinman, I.M.S., then Civil Surgeon at Midnapore. Upon the bomb being opened by Major Weinman, it was found to contain a large number of shots and brownish-yellowish powder which on examination by the Chemical Examiner proved to be a mixture of sulphide of arsenic and chlorate of potash. This mixture is used in what are commonly known as "throw-down" bombs much in use in this country. The bomb, however, contained almost one ounce of the powder. The evidence of the Chemical Examiner proves that the bom

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top