SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 1528

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.
Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another  - Petitioners 
Versus 
The State of West Bengal & Another – Respondents
C.R.R. 1395 of 2022
Decided On : 04-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Apalak Basu, Adv., Mr. Debayan Ghosh, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manojit Bhattacharya, Adv., Ms. Sumitra Bhattacharya, Adv.

A complaint involving outstanding salary claims does not constitute a criminal offense when it lacks elements of criminal intent, and the appropriate claim should be made in civil courts.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 482, 401, and 202 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 406, and 34 - Quashing of complaint against petitioner directors for outstanding salary and performance bonus claims - Complaint was dismissed as it was purely civil in nature and lacked necessary criminal intent; the Court found Summons issued without proper inquiry under Section 202 of CrPC was illegal - District Court lacked jurisdiction over the matter due to the alleged actions taking place outside its territory - The petitioner directors had already divested their shares in the company. (Paras 1, 3, 7, 10, 32, and 34)

(B) Criminal Jurisdiction - Essential ingredients of offences - To establish cheating and criminal breach of trust, the existence of dishonest intention from the outset is necessary. (Paras 6, 30, and 32)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners filed a Criminal Revisional application to quash a complaint concerning unpaid dues from a former employee, alleging that they were wrongfully accused of criminal breach of trust and cheating. The complaint stemmed from an outstanding salary and bonus of over ₹1.47 Crores, but petitioners contended that payments were made during employment and raised objections regarding the jurisdiction of the trial court.

Findings of Court:
The Court found the allegations insufficient to establish a prima facie case for criminal charges and determined the dispute was civil in nature.

Issues: The main issues were the nature of the complaints under the IPC, the jurisdiction of the trial court, and whether the complaint should be dismissed based on its civil nature.

Ratio Decidendi: The absence of criminal intent and the civil nature of the employment dispute warranted the quashing of the complaint; improper issuance of summons without following mandatory inquiry requirements under Section 202 was acknowledged.

Result: CRR No. 1395 of 2022 allowed and summons were quashed against petitioners.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.

1. Petitioners being the accused persons have filed this Criminal Revisional application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for quashing of the Complaint Case No. 180 of 2020 filed by the complainant making accusations under Sections 420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the company and its Directors, petitioners herein. The case is now pending before the Court of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, 6th Court, Sealdah, 24 Parganas (South).

2. Short facts, leading to filing of this present Criminal Revisional application, are summarised as under: -

2a. The Opposite Party No. 2 being the ex-employee of Safal Life Science (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said company’) filed a complaint before the Court of the Learned Judicial Magistrate alleging, inter alia, that the Opposite Party No. 2/complainant was employed by the Board of Directors of the aforesaid company on 31st day of March, 2017 upon issuing appointment letter. The complainant joined as a Chief Executive Officer with effect from 1st April, 2017 and his salary was fixed by the company @ Rs. 2,50,000/- per month plus additional 2% as Performance Bonus of the annual sale volume after deducting the income tax.

2b. The complainant worked there for the financial years 2017- 2018 and 2018-2019 efficiently, sincerely and diligently and is entitled to receive a total Outstanding Salary and Performance Bonus after deducting the income tax including penalty to the tune of Rs. 1,47,64,833/- (Rupees One Crore Forty-Seven Lakh Sixty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty-Three) only after deducting the salary and bonus already received during the period of working tenure. Despite such outstanding dues of salary and Performance Bonus, the accused company did not heed to pay. Notice was sent through e-mail to the accused company on 2nd August, 2020 but in vain. The opposite party no. 2 had lodged a complaint before Ultadanga Police Station on 10.10.2020 with regard to non-payment of Salary and Performance Bonus but no action has been taken by the police against the accused persons for such non-payment of Outstanding Salary and Performance Bonus and commission of offences by way of committing criminal breach of trust and cheating upon the opposite party no. 2. Hence, the complainant has compelled to initiate a complaint case before the Learned Judicial Magistrate. After examination of the witnesses under Section 200 of the CrPC and being fully satisfied with the materials and documents, Learned Magistrate found prime facie case and issued process against the accused persons.

2c. On the other hand, petitioners have disputed and denied the allegations of the complainant. It is specifically contended that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 were Directors of the Safal Life Science (P) Ltd. at the alleged period of work but now they are no longer Directors of the said company. Both are residing in the addresses given in the cause title which fall outside the jurisdiction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, 6th Court, Sealdah, 24 Parganas (South). But, the Learned Magistrate, without holding enquiry under Section 202 of the CrPC, took cognizance under Sections 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 on 22nd February, 2022 and thereby issued summons upon the petitioners which is ex facie illegal and unlawful and same ought to be set aside by this Court for non-compliance of mandatory provision as enshrined in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Cr.PC’).

2d. It is totally absurd and unbelievable that how complainant can claim Outstanding Salary and Performance Bonus of Rs. 1,47,64,833/- (Rupees One Crore Forty-Seven Lakh Sixty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty-Three) only after working for a period of three long years. All payments have been made to the employee during his service period. There are no dues with the company. It is unimaginable to ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top