SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 230

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
Guddi Kumari Balmiki – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Kumar Balmiki – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Saibal Basu, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.

1. No one appears to represent the Opposite Parties.

2. Heard the submissions of the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

3. This is an application filed on behalf of the present petitioner being the wife against an order dated December 05, 2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 4th Court, Alipore, 24 Parganas (South), in connection with ACM- 914 of 2019 whereby the Opposite Party no.1 was directed to pay an amount of Rs.6000/- per month to the petitioner and Rs.5000/- per month to each of her two daughters as an ad interim maintenance.

4. The fact of the case of the petitioner in a nutshell is that the marriage between the parties solemnized on May 13, 1995 and they were blessed with three children. After that the present petitioner being neglected and deserted by the opposite party no.1 along with her three children, filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for the a monthly amount of interim maintenance of Rs.20, 000/- for herself and Rs.20, 000/- each for her two minor daughters from the date of filing of the application. The said application for maintenance was transfe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top