SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 253

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
MADHURESH PRASAD, SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA, JJ.
Food Corporation of India & Ors. - Appellant
Vs.
Sourav Roy & Anr. - Respondent
MAT 211 of 2023
Decided On : 23-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Mr. Devojyoti Barman, Mr. Gopal Roy
For the Respondents: Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mr. Debasish Mukhopadhyay, Mr. Saumyajit Laskar

Candidates must provide valid EWS certificates to substantiate claims; failure to do so leads to cancellation of candidature for reserved category positions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 16(4) - Economic Weaker Sections (EWS) reservation - The appellant challenged the writ Court's directive of appointing the petitioner to a post, citing failure to submit valid EWS certificates; it was determined that the petitioner had originally participated claiming EWS status but did not substantiate it. The cancellation of his candidature was deemed justified. (Paras 11-32)

(B) Recruitment - Eligibility criteria - The requirement to submit valid EWS certificates was upheld; non-compliance led to cancellation of candidature. Additionally, there is no right to be considered under unreserved category without valid EWS status. (Paras 19-23)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for a competitive post claiming EWS status but failed to provide valid certificates despite multiple opportunities. His application was subsequently cancelled due to this lapse.

Findings of Court:
The Court found merit in the cancellation of the petitioner’s application due to inability to provide supporting documents for EWS category, essential to validate his claim.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the legitimacy of the EWS claim, the validity of the cancellation of candidature, and the applicability of merit-based considerations for reserved category candidates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that valid EWS certification is mandatory for claiming reservation; failing to provide this nullifies the basis for any benefit under the reservation system.

Result: Appeal allowed; writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition allowed for appointment under specific terms. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner applied for ews category position. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. opportunity given to submit ews certificate not utilized. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. claim for selection under unreserved category contested. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. authorities maintained that claim for ews was unsubstantiated. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. direction for appointment without prayer improperly granted. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. cancellation of candidature warranted due to falsehood. (Para 19 , 20)
8. ews category requirement substantiated by certificate. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
9. false claims invalidate any rights to reservation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
10. urgent necessity for proper documentation emphasized. (Para 28 , 29)
11. directions based on false claims deemed incorrect. (Para 30 , 31)
12. appeal allowed; writ petition dismissed. (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

MADHURESH PRASAD, J.

1. The writ petition filed by the petitioner has been allowed by the writ Court and a direction has been issued to appoint the petitioner on the post of Assistant Grade-III (Technical) in North Zone subject to fulfilment of other formalities within a period of 4 weeks from the date of the order passed in the writ proceedings. The judgment of the writ Court is dated 14.06.2023.

2. The judgment of the writ Court has been put to challenge in the present appeal. The appellant was the respondent in the writ proceedings.

3. The appellant Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as “FCI” for short) published an advertisement bearing Advertisement No. 1/2019 inviting applications from candidates desirous of appointment in different categories, including the post of Assistant Grade-III (Technical). The advertisement is dated 23.02.2019. The petitioner made his application in response to the advertisement claiming his candidature in a Reserved Category namely the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS).

4. The examination was in two phases. In the Phase 1 examination, the petitioner by virtue of his performance (merit) secured 75.25 marks and qualified.

5. He, thereafter participated in the Phase 2 examination. In the Phase 2 examination he secured 99 out of total 240 marks and was thus placed in the list of selected candidates at serial No. 147 against the reserved category claimed by him (EWS). The authorities prepared two lists namely “Selected List” and “Waiting List”. The petitioner was placed in the Select List under the Reserved Category (EWS). The petitioner thereafter was called for document verification on 25.02.2020, when it was found that he had not submitted a valid EWS certificate for the relevant year (2018-2019) or for (2019-2020). He submitted an undertaking for submission of the same.

6. In view of one letter dated 24.12.2020 issued by the Headmaster, the petitioner was given an opportunity, and by an e-mail dated 04.01.2021 was called for submission of valid EWS certificate. The petitioner was required to produce a certificate valid for the year 2018-2019, issued on basis of income for the financial year 2017- 2018. Another certificate in respect of the year 2019-2020 was also to be submitted, issued on the basis of income for the financial year 2018-2019. In spite of opportunity being given, the petitioner failed to submit the EWS certificate.

7. The respondent authorities in the above circumstances gave a last opportunity to the petitioner vide e-mail notice dated 04.02.2021 to submit a valid EWS certificate by 12.02.2021. The e-mail clearly specified that in case of non-submission of valid EWS certificate the petitioner’s candidature will be cancelled without any further communication/ opportunity.

8. Two days prior to the last date for submission of valid EWS certificate the petitioner submitted an affidavit dated 09.02.2021. As per the affidavit, the petitioner claimed that he did not avail any relaxation in the Phase 1 examination. In the circumstance his candidature cannot be cancelled and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top