SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 450

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Gautam Mallick – Appellant
Versus
Sudeshna Mallick – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ms. Baisali Ghoshal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Argha Banerjee, Adv.

Judgment :

Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.

1. The petitioner being the husband of the opposite party no. 1/wife has assailed the Judgment and Order dated 22.04.2022 passed by the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, 8th Court, South 24 Parganas in Criminal Motion No. 68 of 2020. The said Revisional application arose out of an order dated 21.12.2019 passed in Misc. Case No. 8/2019 filed under Section 127 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the petitioner seeking thereby for modification or alteration of the order of maintenance granted at the rate of Rs. 4,000/- per month in a proceeding instituted under Section 125 of the CrPC.

2. By the impugned judgment, the Learned Judge dismissed Criminal Motion No. 68 of 2020 on contest without order as to cost, thereby affirming the order dated 21.12.2019 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 8th Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas.

3. The background fact is that the opposite party no. 1/wife initiated a proceeding under Section 125 of CrPC claiming maintenance from the petitioner/husband and same was registered as Misc. Case No. 413 of 2012 before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 8th Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas.

4. During pendency of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top