SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 513

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Partha Sarathi Sen, J, PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Lakshmi Rani Dinda – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Bhaskar Ch. Manna
For the State : Mr. Sk. Md. Galib, Sr. Govt. Adv., Mr. Kapil Guha
For the Respondent: Mr. Brajesh Jha, Mr. Rahul Sarkar, Ms. Dipika Sarkar

Headnote: Read headnote

Table of Content
1. claim for compensation based on predecessors. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 8)
2. evaluation of authority's adherence to property ownership and representation protocols. (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 14)
3. delay in claims can invalidate compensation entitlement. (Para 20 , 21)
4. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 23)

JUDGMENT : 

1. The subject matter of the instant writ petition is the order dated 24.11.2022 as passed by the respondent no. 2/authority whereby and whereunder the said respondent no. 2/authority declined to consider the representation of the writ petitioners for disburs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top