SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 906

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Sk. Asaruddin – Appellant
Versus
Santanu Ghosh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Amit Ranjan Roy
For the Respondent: Shaibalendu Bhowmick

JUDGMENT :

ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.

1. Both the Learned Advocates representing the appellants/claimants Company and the respondents/Insurance Company are present in Court.

2. The instant appeal had been filed against the judgment and award dated 27.01.2006 passed by the Learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Purba Medinipore at Tamluk in M.A.C. Case No. 61 of 2025/55 of 2025.

3. The Learned Advocate representing the appellant submitted that the instant appeal had been filed against the Judgment and award dated 27.01.2006 passed by the Judge Motor Accident Tribunal, Purba Medinipore at Tamluk in MAC Case No. 61/2005 by 55/2005 deciding an application under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It was further submitted disregarding the claimed income of the victim to be Rs.4,500/- per month the Tribunal has assessed the compensation to the extent of Rs.2,09,000/- against the claimed amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. The Learned Advocate representing the appellant referred to the decision cited in Ram Murti & Ors. Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board (Civil Appeal No. 7143 of 2022):

“The High Court has affirmed the judgment of the Tribunal in regard to the dismissal of the claim under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top