Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, UDAY KUMAR
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Rubber Products and Moulding Company – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case related to land acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 21) |
| 2. arguments concerning validity of enhanced compensation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. citations illustrating court's power to review judgments. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. jurisdictional aspects related to inferior courts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. importance of compensation assurance in property acquisition. (Para 36 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. lapse of acquisition proceedings due to failure to meet statutory time limits. (Para 44 , 46 , 47) |
| 7. conclusion of dismissal of review applications. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
JUDGMENT :
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
1. The State of West Bengal has filed the present application for review of a judgment and order dated April 30, 2025, passed in F.A No.84 of 2019, whereby it was, inter alia, held that the enhanced compensation award was found to be invalid on the ground that the acquisition proceeding had lapsed in view of the delay in passing the award, more than two years after the issuance of the notice under Section 9 (3B) of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (hereinafter refer as the “1894 Act”).
2. The relevant facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that initially the subject-land was
The lapse of acquisition proceedings under the 1948 Act can invalidate subsequent awards unless a fresh notice is issued under Section 9 of the 1894 Act, which initiates new vesting.
The court ruled that acquisition proceedings under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act lapsed due to non-compliance with statutory requirements, reviving the rights of original lan....
Notices under Section 4(1a) of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 issued prior to March 31, 1992, and for which no award was passed within 3 years, had already lapsed and co....
The court established that lapsed acquisition notices under the 1948 Act result in the revival of original ownership, and subsequent notices cannot validate expired proceedings.
The court established that incomplete land acquisition proceedings under the 1948 Act lapse under Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act, mandating compensation determination according to the latter.
Failure to comply with statutory timelines for land acquisition leads to the lapse of the acquisition, reviving the original owner's title to the land.
Where Section 24(1)(a) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (2013 Act) applies, i.e. where there is no Award on the date o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acquisition proceedings lapsed as no award was made within 2 years of the declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act, and the State was d....
Failure to pass an award within 12 months post-enactment of the new land acquisition legislation results in lapse of the acquisition proceedings initiated under the old legislation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
