SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 1099

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA


JUDGMENT :

Rai Chattopadhyay, J.

(1) Two writ petitions being W.P. No. 17846(w) of 2012 and W.P. No. 11513(w) of 2019 are taken up together for disposal by dint of this common judgment, as the two are connected and deal with the same subject matter, which is as follows; 

(2) The subject matter of challenge in W.P.No. 17846(w) of 2012 are the two notifications being (i) No. 429-M.W&C/9M-9/2000 dated January 29, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as No.429) and (ii) No. 2537-M.W.&C/1M-05/99(Pt.1) dated August 22, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as No.2537). 
 
(3) By way of amendment of the said writ petition, the petitioner has further challenged the West Bengal Act XXVII of 2014 being the West Bengal Agricultural Produce (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the Amendment Act of 2014 or the 2014 Amendment Act) and the West Bengal Act XVI of 2017 being the West Bengal Agricultural Produce (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Amendment Act of 2017 or the 2017 Amendment Act). 
 
(4) The subject matter of challenge in W.P. No. 11513 (w) of 2019, is the assessment order dated June 30, 2016, issued by the Secretary, Purba Bardhaman Zila Regulated





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top