IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
KRISHNA RAO, J.
Sukhlal Chandanmull (P) Ltd. – Plaintiff
Versus
Harrow Hall – Defendant
GA No. 7 of 2022 In CS No. 364 of 2014
Decided On : 12-02-2025
JUDGMENT :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. The defendant has filed the present application being G.A. No. 7 of 2022 in C.S. No. 364 of 2014 under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of plaint on the ground that the plaintiff has filed the suit against the Society, namely, Harrow Hall, through its Secretary but has not disclosed name of the Secretary.
2. Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Learned Senior Advocate representing the defendant submits that the suit has neither been filed against the name of the President, nor the Secretary or any of the office bearers authorized by the Governing Body.
3. Mr. Ghosh submits that every suit by or against a Society, must be filed either in the name or against the name of the President, the Secretary or any office bearers authorized by the Governing Body. He submits that as per Section 19 of the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961, every Society may sue or may be sued in the name of the President, the Secretary or any office bearers authorized by the Governing Body.
4. Mr. Ghosh submits that the defendant Society is a registered Society under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961 but the name of the Secretary is not mentioned in the cause title of the plaint. He submits that the plaintiff is aware that Mr. Sugata Chakraborty is the Secretary of the defendant Society as the plaintiff has exchanged several correspondences with him but has not named the Secretary of the Society in the cause tittle.
5. Mr. Ghosh in support of his submissions relied upon the judgment in the case of Sha-San Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Thakur Corner Byabsayee Kalyan Samity & Ors. reported in 2010 SCC OnLine Cal 1784 and submitted that neither the name of President nor the name of Secretary has been mentioned in the cause title of the plaint nor the name of any other authorized member was mentioned in the body of the plaint, as such the presentation of plaint itself is defective.
6. Mr. Ghosh relied upon the judgment in the case of Illachi Devi (Dead) By Lrs. & Others Vs. Jain Society, Protection of Orphans India & Others reported in (2003) 8 SCC 413 and submitted that the society registered under the Societies Registration Act as contradistinguished from a company registered under the Companies Act cannot sue or sued in its own name.
7. Mr. Ghosh relied upon the judgment in the case of 12, I.C. Bose Road Tenants’ Association vs. Collector of Howrah & Ors. reported in AIR 1977 Cal 437 and submitted that the defendant is a registered Society under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961. Under Sub-Section (1) of Section 19 of the said Act every Society may sue or may be sued in the name of the President, the Secretary, or any office bearer authorized by the Governing Body in this Behalf. In view of Section 19(1), the Society itself has no locus standi to maintain an action.
8. Mr. Ghosh relied the judgment in the case of National Council of YMCA’s of India vs. Skipper Textiles Private Ltd. reported in 2009 SCC OnLine Cal 909 and submitted that Section 19 of the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961 specifically provides for suits and proceedings by and against the Society being maintained in the name of its president, Secretary and any office bearer authorized by the governing body.
9. Mr. Sabyasachi Choudhury, Learned Senior Advocate representing the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff has filed the suit against the Society through its Secretary and in the cause title of the plaint, the description of the defendant is mentioned through its Secretary and it is not necessary to file the suit in the name of the Secretary of the Society.
10. Mr. Choudhury submits that if the case is filed in the name of the Secretary, every time when the Secretary or the President of the Society is change, the plaintiff has to amend the cause title of the suit on every occasion.
11. Mr. Choudhury submits that the plaintiff has made the Society as defendant represented through its Secretary and thus it
An applicant seeking to be added as a party must demonstrate direct interest in the subject matter of the suit; failure to do so results in dismissal.
A society may sue in its own name through authorized office bearers under Section 19 of the Societies Registration Act, 1961; omission to name the natural person holding the office does not invalidat....
: If on application to the governing body some other officer or person be not nominated to be the defendant and thereby when it is seen that the Society must sue or be sued through a person nominated....
The court established that membership eligibility in a society is governed by its bye-laws, and individuals cannot claim membership rights without meeting the stipulated criteria. Additionally, the c....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of genuine rival claims or disputes and the need for prima facie material before the Registrar can validly exercise jurisdiction....
Disputes arising from the internal management of a registered society are not justiciable in writ jurisdiction and must be resolved in a competent civil court.
A society's suit must be filed according to authorized resolutions, absence of such leads to dismissal and protection for office bearers acting within given authority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.