Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Ananda Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.
1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2007 passed by the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Khatra, Bankura in Sessions Trial No.8(1)/2006 arising out of Sessions Case No.10(11)/2005 convicting the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing the appellant to suffer simple imprisonment for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 year.
2. The prosecution case precisely stated on 27.10.04 at about 06:30 a.m., the complainant i.e., one Goutam Lohar of village Siarbani under Taldangra P.S. agitated his elder brother i.e., Uttam Lohar went to attend nature’s call at a nearby pond, when the appellant assaulted him with “Katari” and “Kurul (axe)” on his head, neck and different body parts for murdering him and instantaneously the victim fell on the ground and collapsed. The complainant and another elder brother i.e., Mangal Lohar rushed to the spot and saw the incident at a distance, while the appellant fled from the spot. His elder brother i.e., Uttam Lohar (the victim) and the wife of the appellant namely Smt. Bhakti Singh had
The court clarified that for a conviction under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove the accused's intention to kill, which was not established in this case.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
Intent to commit murder under Section 307 IPC can be inferred from the nature of the act and the weapon used, regardless of the severity of injuries.
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 307 IPC, establishing intent to cause grievous harm based on corroborated eyewitness and medical evidence.
The severity of injuries and the intention of the accused are crucial in justifying a conviction under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
The conviction under Section 307 IPC requires proof of intent to cause death, not necessarily severe injuries; intent can be inferred from circumstances and actions during the incident.
The court clarified that a conviction for attempted murder requires clear evidence of intent, which was lacking, thus warranting a lesser charge.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
