Back
PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Peeru Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 31-7-1999 passed by the learned First Additional Session Judge, District Shajapur (M.P.) in ST No. 37/1999, whereby, the appellant has been convicted under section 307 and 450 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and sentenced to undergo 07 years and 05 years R.I. with fine of Rs. 25000/- and Rs. 2000/- with default stipulation.
2. As per the prosecution case, in the night of 24-11-1998, the complainant namely Ramesh came to his house at about 3 AM after irrigating the agriculture field. He was sleeping in the veranda after closing the door. At about 4:00 AM, one Peru Singh entered into the house and assaulted him on his chin and neck by means of sword with intention to kill him. After the assault, blood was oozing out and on his screaming, his mother son and other witnesses came on the spot. They have taken the injured to the hospital and lodged the complaint. Therefore, the police recorded the statements of the witnesses and registered the FIR under sections 450 and 307 of Indian Penal Code. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed and the case
The court clarified that a conviction for attempted murder requires clear evidence of intent, which was lacking, thus warranting a lesser charge.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
The court clarified that for a conviction under Section 307 IPC, the prosecution must prove the accused's intention to kill, which was not established in this case.
To establish an offense under Section 307 IPC, proof of intent to kill is required; a single injury does not suffice to conclude such intent, allowing for conviction under Section 326 IPC instead.
Witness testimonies cannot be discarded solely due to their relation to the victim; evidence must be considered on credibility and context, with mitigating factors influencing sentencing.
The intention to cause death and the sufficiency of the acts to cause death in the ordinary course of nature are essential elements of the offense of attempt to murder under Section 307 of the IPC. C....
The court determined that the conviction under Section 307 was unwarranted, affirming instead a conviction under Section 325 for voluntarily causing grievous hurt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the intention of the accused in a criminal act may be deduced from circumstances and the nature of injuries caused, and it is not essential th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the authority to analyze the evidence and modify the conviction and sentence based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
