SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 180

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
KRISHNA RAO
Ritankar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Mandal Mr. Soumya Dasgupta Mr. Sattwik Majumder
For the State : Mr. Kishore Datta, Ld. AG Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Ld. AGP Ms. Sumita Shaw Mr. Soumen Chatterjee
For the Union of India : Mr. Ashok Kumar Chakraborti, Ld. ASGI Mr. Nilanjan Bhattarcharjee Mr.
For the Election Commission of India : Mr. D.S. Naidu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury Ms. Anamika Pandey Ms. Sanskriti Agarwal Ms. Rishik
For the Intervenor : Mr. Samim Ahammed Mr. Arka Maiti Ms. Ambiya Khatun Mr. Arka Ranjan Bhattacharya Md. Nasirul Haque Ms. Reshma Khatun Ms. Huma

Judgment :

Krishna Rao, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April, 2026 wherein the Chief Electoral Officer has issued an order by imposing restriction on motorcycle riding /rally on polling day-2 and on polling day for conduct of free, fair, peaceful and violence free Election–2026. The petitioner submits that the respondent no. 3 has issued the said order without any authority. He submits that by issuing the said impugned order infringed the fundamental right of the petitioner.

2. Mr. Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner submits that it is settled law that if a statue described a thing to be done in a particular manner, it has to be done in the same manner and other methods are forbidden.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent no. 3 has issued blanket prohibition orders bears no rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved. He submits that after issuance of the impugned order, the petitioner has made representation to the respondent no. 3 and on receipt of the representation of the petitioner, the respondent no. 3 has modified the impugned or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top