SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 346

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA SARKAR
Tushar Doshi – Appellant
Versus
Dindayal Kayan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Subir Banerjee, Md. Hossain.

JUDGMENT :

Shampa Sarkar, J.

1) The application has been filed challenging the order dated March 11, 2025, passed by the learned Judge, 4th Bench, Presidency Small Causes Court at Calcutta in Ejectment Suit No. 86 of 2018.

2) By the order impugned, the learned Court rejected an application dated January 15, 2025. The petitioner filed the said application as a tenant, seeking permission to deposit the rent in connection with the suit property as was adjudicated on November 27, 2024.

3) Learned advocate for the petitioner contends that the calculation of the arrear rent that was found to be payable under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) was erroneous. The Court had directed payment of arrear rent for 92 months, along with maintenance charges and quarterly corporation tax together with the statutory interest. The petitioners were directed to go on paying the current rent and the Corporation tax for the upcoming quarters of the financial year within the time specified in Section 7(1)(c) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.

4) On perusal of the application for extension of time to make the payment of the amount determin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top