SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Chh) 126

L.C.BHADOO
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
SARIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RAIPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.Sharma, Sunil Otwani

( 1 ) THE petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the constitution of India being aggrieved by order dated 13-3-2002 passed by learned additional District Judge (Special Judge), raipur in Suit No. 2-B/2000 whereby learned Additional District Judge has rejected the objection raised by the petitioner herein that the Additional District Judge has no jurisdiction to decide the application filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts leading to filing of this petition are that a dispute had arisen between the parlies and therefore, the matter was referred to the Arbitrator, who passed the arbitral award dated 11-12-1998 in favour of the respondent herein. Against the said award the petitioner herein moved an application under Section 34 of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter shall be referred as to "the Act of 1996") in the Court of District Judge, Raipur for setting aside the said award. However, learned district Judge transferred that application to the Court of learned Additional District judge (Special Judge) Raipur, which was registered as Suit No. 2-B/2000. The petitioner herein by amending his




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top