T.P.SHARMA, R.N.CHANDRAKAR
Asfaq Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
Aysha Qureshi (Nivedita Yadav) – Respondent
T.P. Sharma, J.
1. F.A. (M) Nos. 47/2008 & 128/2008 arising out of the common judgment and decree dated 6-2-2008 passed by the 2nd Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg (for short 'the Family Court) in Civil Suit Nos. 157A/2007 & 158A/2007 are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Vide F.A. (M) No. 128/2008, the appellant has challenged legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 6-2-2008 passed by the Family Court in Civil Suit No. 157A/2007 whereby the petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the appellant has been dismissed.
3. Vide F.A. (M) No. 47/2008, the appellant has challenged legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 6-2-2008 passed by the Family Court in Civil Suit No. 158A/2007 whereby the Family Court has decreed the suit, filed by the respondent against the appellant, for declaration of marriage void.
4. The appellant has challenged legality and propriety of the judgment and decree on the ground that the parties are Muslim legally wedded spouses, the Family Court was not having jurisdiction to entertain suit for declaration of marriage to be void under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Family
Smt. Neeta Kirti Desai v. Bino Samuel George AIR 1998 Bom 74;
Shaji v. Gopinath AIR 1995 Mad 161;
Abdur Rahim v. Padma AIR 1982 Bom 341;
J. Kumaradasan Nair v. IRIC Sohan AIR 2009 SCW 1921 : AIR 2009 SC 1333;
Ahmedabad Women Action Group (AWAG) v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 573 : AIR 1997 SC 3614;
Chand Patel v. Bismillah Begum (2008) 4 SCC 774 : AIR 2008 SC 1915
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.