SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Chh) 435

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
LAKHAN SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CO. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri Awadh Tripathi, for the Applicant.
Shri Sushi I Dubey, Govt. Advocate, for the State.

ORDER

1. This is an application filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 582/2005 registered at Police station Supela, Distt. Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915.

2. The brief facts are that 27 bulk litres of Desi Masala liquor amounting to Rs. 6,000/- was seized from the house of co-accused Raju Pandit, s/o Surendra Pandit on 4-7-2005 at about 20.00 hours. The allegations are that the aforesaid liquor also belonged to the present applicant, who ran away from the spot at the time of seizure.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the contents of the\seizure memo would show that the seizure was made from the house of Raju Pandit and it has been specifically mentioned in the seizure memo that at the time of seizure, Raju Pandit ran away from the spot and there is no whisper about the presence of this applicant in the seizure memo. He further argues that the name of this applicant comes for the first time in the statement of one of the Panch witnesses namely Kishore Kumar, where it has been adde










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top