SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1017

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA, DIPAK MISRA
Naresh Kumar Lahria – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Parag Chaturvedi, PUNEET CHATURVEDI, R.S.Jha,

Judgment

( 1. ) INVOKING the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for a declaration that the provisions contained in Section 59-A (i) of the M. P. Excise Act, 1915 (in short the Act) brought into existence by M. P. Excise (Amendment) Act, 2000 (Act No. 22/2000) to the extent it prohibits any Court for entertaining the application for grant of anticipatory bail is unconstitutional.

( 2. ) THE facts as setforth in the petition are that the petitioner who is a graduate belongs to the family of lawyer and he has no criminal record. He has been implicated falsely in Cr. Case No. 405/2000 registered at the Police Station, Gohalpur, Jabalpur. According to the petitioner he is engaged in the business of travel agency and he is the owner of the Geeta Travellers situated at Katni. The authorities of the Police Station, Gohalpur seized a Maruti Van No. MP-20 T OJ 64 i-n an abandoned condition and from the said van the police seized 25 boxes of English Wine and registered the aforesaid crime under Section 34 of the Act. The investigating agency arrested Churaman, Santosh and the owner of the van but later on all were r





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top