L.C.BHADOO, DHIRENDRA MISHRA
AMAR SAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
1. Criminal Appeal No. 1626/1994 filed by accused Amar Sai pertaining to the murder of Balmukund arising out of the Sessions Trial No. 49/93, Criminal Appeal No. 710/2005 filed by the Same accused pertaining to the murder of Ratan arising out of the Sessions Trial No. 47/93 and Criminal Appeal No. 729/ 2005 filed by the same accused pertaining to the murder of Phulbaso Bai arising out of the Sessions Trial No. 48/93 are being disposed of by this common judgment, as the evidence in all these three cases is similar and all the three murders of Balmukund, Phulbaso Bai & Ratan were committed at the same time, at one place, at the residence of deceased Balmukund, alleged to have been committed by accused/appellant Amer Sai.
2. By these appeals, accused/appellant Amar Sai has questioned the legality of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24-9-1994 passed in Sessions Trail No. 49/93 pertaining to the murder of Balmukung, also the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29-9-1994 passed in Sessions Trial No.4 7 /93 pertaining to the murder of Rat an, and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28-9-1994 passed in Sessions Trial No. 48/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.