ALOK ARADHE
Bhagwati Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Mathura Devi – Respondent
1. With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. In this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the validity of the order dated 8-8-2011 passed by the Trial Court. In order to appreciate the petitioner's challenge to the impugned order, few facts need mention which are state infra.
3. The respondents-plaintiffs filed the suit for specific performance of the contract on the basis of an agreement dated 25-7-2006. Under the agreement, out of total consideration of Rs 11,01,000/-, sum of Rs. 6,01,000/- was paid to the defendants by way of cheques. The plaintiff submitted his examination-in-chief under Order 18 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On behalf of the defendants another agreement dated 5-8-2006 was produced in which the amount of sale consideration was mentioned as Rs. 25 lacs and an amount of Rs. 6,01,000/- was paid under the agreement to the defendants and the amount of Rs. 18,99,000/- was shown payable to the defendants. An objection was raised by the Counsel for the plaintiffs with regard to the admissibility of the aforesaid agreement dated 5-8-2006 on the ground that the same was insufficiently
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.