YATINDRA SINGH, SUNIL KUMAR SINHA
Monnet Ispat & Energy Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
1. The main question involved in these writ petitions relates to the validity of Rule 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Electricity Rules, 2005 (the Rules).
THE FACTS
2. Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited (the petitioner) is a public company registered under the Companies Act. It entered into Memorandum of Understanding (the MOU) with the State of Chhattisgarh on 21.05.2001, by which it was supposed to set up units to manufacture sponge iron, steel structural rolling mill, and ferro alloys at Raigarh (the Raigarh-unit) and Raipur (the Raipur-unit) districts. Subsequently, another MOU was entered on 04.05.2007, by which the petitioner was required to further invest in the units.
3. By the MOUs, the petitioner was also permitted to establish Captive Generating Plants (CGPs) at both places, referred to as the Raipur-CGP and the Raigarh-CGP.
4. The petitioner had planned to set the CGPs along with the units. The CGPs were installed but due to recession, the units could not be installed to their full capacity. The result was they could not utilise the electricity generated by the CGPs to extent it was supposed to do.
5. In order to use the electricity generated by the CGPs, the petitioner entered
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.