YATINDRA SINGH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Geeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
1. The main point involved in these two writ petitions is,
'Whether the word ^fu;fer^ (regular) in sub-rule (1) of rule 4 {4(1)} of the Mahila Bahuuddeshiya Swasthya Karyakarta (ANM) Pathyakram Pravesh Niyam, 2011 (the Rules), is discriminatory.'
THE FACTS
2. The State Government conducts 1½ year Auxilliary Nursing and Midwifery course (the ANM-Course) for the appointment on the post of Multipurpose Health Worker, which includes ANM. The admission in the ANM-Course is governed by the Rules.
3. Rule 4(1) of the Rules provides minimum educational qualification for admission. It is as follows:
(4) efgyk cgqmís’kh; LokLF; dk;ZdrkZ ¼,-,u-e-½ izf’k{k.k ikB;Øe es izos’k gsrq U;wure ‘kS{kf.kd vgrkZ;sa % 1- 10$2 f’k{kk i}fr es fu;fer ijh{kk 12oh d{kk mRrh.kZ vFkok iqjkuh i}fr es gkb;j lSdsaMjh ijh{kk mÙkh.kZ gksuk vfuok;Z gksxkA
WP 7934 of 2011
4. The Respondent published an advertisement for admission in the ANM-Course in the month of October, 2011 for the session 2011-2012.
5. Smt. Geeta Singh filed an application for admission in the ANM-Course. Her application was not entertained on the ground that she had passed 12th class privately and not as a regular student. She has filed Writ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.