SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Chh) 7

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Lov Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Mateen Siddiqui, counsel for the applicant.
Shri D.K. Gwalre, Govt. Advocate for the State.

ORDER

(1) Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the applicant herein has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail, as he is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 27/2010 registered at police station Anti Corruption Bureau, Raipur for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(e) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (henceforth ‘PC Act).

(2) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant has amassed wealth of Rs. 2,91,56,508/- disproportionate to his known source of income while working as Assistant Excise Officer and thereby he has committed the aforesaid offence.

(3) Appearing for the applicant, Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, learned counsel would submit that the applicant has not amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income as his statement has been recorded before the Investigating Officer on 16.12.2011 and he has sought information with regard to check period, which has been replied by Anti Corruption Bureau on 18.4.2012 and the applicant and his wife & son are cooperating with the enquiry, which is apparent from the documents filed by the applicant along with the bail petition. He wo





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top