Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. Common questions of law arises for consideration in these revisions, were heard analogously and shall stand disposed of by this common order. The imperative facts required for judging the correctness of the impugned order are as under:-

1.1 Non-applicant No. 1-Smt. Manju Dwivedi was married to applicant on 28.4.1996 as per Hindu rights and customs and out of their wedlock, non-applicant No. 2-Naman born on 28.07.1997 at Bilaspur.

1.2 It is the case of the non-applicant No. 1 that after the marriage when she became pregnant, applicant started harassing her on account of demand of dowry and other means, by which she was forced to leave her matrimonial house and then she came to her parental house along with her minor son Naman and, thereafter the applicant did not take care of her and neglected to maintain them, leading to filing of the application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 18.01.2001 before the Family Court, Bilaspur.

1.3 The present applicant filed his reply to the said application and admitted the relationship of husband and wife between him & non-applicant No. 1 and also admitted that the non-applicant No. 2 is his son; and f