SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Ramchandra Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. This appeal by five appellants/accused namely Ramchandra Goyal (A1), Ajay Kumar (A2), Dinesh Kumar (A3), Mukesh Kumar (A4) and Smt. Vimla Devi (A5) is directed against the judgment of conviction recorded by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, in S.T. No. 99/96 whereby the Sessions Judge has convicted the appellants for commission of offence punishable under Sections 304-B and 306 of Indian Penal Code (for short, IPC) and sentenced each of the appellants to undergo R.I. for 10 years U/s. 304-B and R. 1. for 7 years U/s. 306 IPC and further directed that both the sentences shall run concurrently. Facts of the case, giving rise to this appeal are as under:--
1.1. That, Sulochana (deceased) was married with appellant No. 2/Ajay Kumar on 20.02.1994. Shortly after the marriage, Sulochana complained to her parents namely Phpolchand (PW-1-father), Parwati (PW-6-mother), Rajkumar (PW-4-brother) and Madan Lal (PW-5) that the appellants were demanding dowry and subjecting her to cruelty in connection with said demand. The complaint was made on few occasions whenever Sulochana visited her parental home and ultimately committed suicide by hanging herse
K. Prema S. Rao Vs. Yadla Srinivasa Rao (2003) 1 SCC 217
Kaliyaperumal Vs. State of T.N. (2004) 9 SCC 157
Devi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan (2007) 14 SCC 176
Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Haryana (2010) 12 SCC 350
Harjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2006) 1 SCC 463
Ram Badan Sharma Vs. State of Bihar (2006) 10 SCC 115
Yashoda Vs. State of M.P. (2004) 3 SCC 98
Appasaheb and another Vs. State of Maharashtra (2007) 9 SCC 721
Shahadal Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra 2012 (11) SCC 397
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.