SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Chh) 39

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Chattisgarh – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard.

2. This revision is directed against the order dated 9-1-2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Balod in Criminal Appeal No. 114 of 2014, by which, the appellate Court has held the appellant guilty of commission of offence under Sections 354, 341 and 323 of IPC.

3. According to the prosecution story, when the prosecutrix, P.W.1 was going on her bicycle to her house at village Parsada on 23-6-2014 at about 2 p.m. near the canal, the applicant came across, wearing underwear and waist and obstructed the prosecutrix, dragged her towards nearby canal and assaulted, used criminal force and also hurled abuses and insisted on sexual intercourse. The prosecutrix lodged FIR in Ex.P.1 in the Police Station. The applicant was arrested, investigation was carried out and charge-sheet was filed for alleged commission of offences under Sections 354-B, 354, 341 and 323 of IPC and charges were framed against the applicant by the trial Court. Applicant was tried for commission of offences alleged. Vide impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27-11-2014, the applicant was held guilty of the offences and sentenced 4 years R.I. under Section 354-B of IPC with a fine of Rs.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top