SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Himalaya Drugs Company Trademark/Registered Trade Mark- M. M. I. Corporation Licence Users, the Himalaya Drugs Company – Appellant
Versus
Shalaj Nathaniel – Respondent
1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein who are a pharmaceutical industry and its officers have questioned the order dated 4-3-2008 passed by the Labour Court, Bilaspur by which the Labour Court has declined to adjudicate the preliminary objection and directed it to be adjudicated at the time of final hearing and further, questioned the order dated 14-7-2008 by which the application under Order 14 Rule 5 of the CPC for framing additional issue, has been rejected finding no merit.
2. Mr. Parag Kotecha, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that the orders passed by the Labour Court rejecting the application for preliminary objection as well as rejecting the application for framing additional issue, are unjustified, as the respondent is not Medical Representative and is not workman, as such duly covered by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the matter of H.R. Adyanthaya etc. etc. v. Sandoz (India) Ltd. etc. etc. AIR 1994 SC 2608. Therefore, the impugned orders be set aside and the matter be remitted to the trial Court for framing issue and deciding that issue as preliminary issue.
3.
D.P. Maheshwari v. Delhi Administration and others
H.R. Adyanthaya etc. etc. v. Sandoz (India) Ltd. etc. etc.
Major S.S. Khanna v. Brig. F.J. Dillon
National Council for Cement & Building Materials v. State of Haryana
Ramesh Chandra Sankla and others v. Vikram Cement and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.