IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
Fohara Bai Miri, W/o Shri Ramnath Miri - Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Urban Administration Development Department and Ors - Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No.2127 of 2017
Decided on : 14-08-2018
Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Section 32-B – Election - Account of election expenses - Show-cause notice - State Election Commission - Disqualification for failure to lodge account of election expenses - Petitioner was elected as President of Nagar Panchayat and election was notified in Official Gazette - She was obliged to submit her election expenses within 30 days from date of election as President of Nagar Pachayat by virtue of Section 32-B of Act, 1961 which she could not submit leading to issuance of show-cause notice by Chhattisgarh State Election Commission to show-cause as to why she not be disqualified for failing to lodge account of expenses within time and manner required by Act of 1961 - She replied show-cause notice clearly stating that she was unaware of provision relating to lodging of election expenses within 30 days from date of notification of election, but since that reply was not signed by her, she was again subjected to notice to which she filed reply stating inter alia that the requirement of lodging election expenses was not informed to her by any of election officers or District Election Officer and she being a Scheduled Caste woman and only studied up to Class-II, did not have technical and legal knowledge of lodging expenses and therefore she could not file same - Held, Court considered opinion, the explanation given by petitioner constitutes good cause / justification within meaning of Section 32-C(b) of the Act of 1961, meaning thereby, the second limb of Section 32-C of Act of 1961 is not satisfied and therefore declaration of State Election Commission that the petitioner is disqualified for being chosen as President of Nagar Panchayat, Maro is arbitrary and contrary to law apart from being illegal - As such, order impugned of the State Election Commission deserves to be and is hereby quashed - As a fallout and consequence of aforesaid discussion, order passed by the State Election Commission holding the petitioner to be disqualified on post of President of Nagar Panchayat, Maro is hereby quashed and also resultant direction that she will not be eligible to be chosen as President for four years is also quashed - It is directed that she is entitled and eligible to assume the office of President forthwith - Writ petition is allowed.
1. The petitioner herein was elected as President of Nagar Panchayat Maro, Distt. Bemetara, on 31-12-2015 and the election was notified in the Official Gazette on 4-1-2016. She was obliged to submit her election expenses within 30 days from the date of election as President of Nagar Pachayat by virtue of Section 32-B of the Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act of 1961'), which she could not submit leading to issuance of show-cause notice by the Chhattisgarh State Election Commission on 23-5- 2016 to show-cause as to why she not be disqualified for failing to lodge the account of expenses within time and manner required by the Act of 1961. She replied the show-cause notice on 17-6-2016 clearly stating that she was unaware of the provision relating to lodging of election expenses within 30 days from the date of notification of election, but since that reply was not signed by her, she was again subjected to notice on 7-12-2016 to which she filed reply on 17-1-2017 stating inter alia that the requirement of lodging election expenses was not informed to her by any of the election officers or the District Election Officer and she being a Scheduled Caste woman and only studied up to Class-II, did not have the technical and legal knowledge of lodging expenses and therefore she could not file the same. On 29-5-2017, on being asked by the Commissioner, Chhattisgarh State Election Commission to again appear before the Commission to record her statement, she appeared and made statement on that day that she being an illiterate lady and not aware of the legal provision regarding lodging of election expenses within 30 days from the date of election apart from being unwell on that day, could not file the same and that constitutes good cause for not filing election expenses within the time stipulated under Section 32-B of the Act of 1961.
2. The State Election Commission by its impugned order considered the reply filed by the petitioner at the first instance that she being an illiterate SC woman was not aware of the legal requirement of lodging election expenses within 30 days and also considered the subsequent statement that she remained unwell till 28-2-2016, and holding the two statements to be contradictory held that no good cause or justification for failure to file election expenses has been shown by her and consequently disqualified her to further hold the post of President of Nagar Panchayat and also disqualified her for being elected on the post of President or Councillor of the municipality for a period of four years. Questioning legality, validity and correctness of the order passed by the State Election Commission disqualifying the petitioner from holding the post of President, Nagar Panchayat, Maro and also questioning her further disqualification for being elected on the post of President or Councillor of the municipality for four years, this writ petition has been filed.
3. Return has been filed by the State Election Commission opposing the averments made in the writ petition stating inter alia that the petitioner has failed to show good reason / justification for not lodging the election expenses within the stipulated time and in the manner prescribed in Section 32-C(b) of the Act of 1961.
4. Mr. Bharat Rajput, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner being a Scheduled Caste illiterate woman aged about 50 years was not aware of the legal requirement of lodging election expenses within 30 days from the date of her election and therefore she could not file the same and it was never informed to her by any of the election officers or District Election Officer to lodge the expenses, however, she had already filed the election expenses on 29-2-2016 and the time taken in filing the same is on account of illiteracy and not being aware of the requirement of law to lodge the said expenses which constitutes good reason within the meaning of Section 32-C(b) of the Act of 1961
Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar and others
Bhagwan Swaroop and others v. Mool Chand and others
Ram Sumiran and others v. D.D.C. and others
Sital Prasad Saxena (dead) v. Union of India and others
M/s. Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Shantilal (Bum Bum) v. State of M.P. and others
Jawahar Lal Gupta v. Rajya Nirvachan Ayog, Bhopal
Sadashiv H. Patil v. Vithal D. Teke and others
Mohan Lal Tripathi v. District Magistrate, Rae Bareily
Ram Beti v. District Panchayat Raj Adhikari
Indian National Congress (I) v. Institute of Social Welfare
Bachhitar Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 395 and Union of India v. H.C. Goel
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir v. District Collector, Raigad and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.