SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Chh) 453

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Manoj Kumar, S/o Shankarlal Rajgariya – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Shri D.R. Agrawal and Shri Dhirendra Prasad Mishra, Advocates
For the Respondents:Shri Neeraj Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4.8.2000 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon in Sessions Trial No.29 of 2000 convicting and sentencing each of the Appellants as under:

Conviction

Sentence

Under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code

Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that deceased Neelkamal was employed as a driver in Pujari Industry owned by the present Appellants/accused. It is alleged that on 2.8.1999 at about 9:30 a.m., vehicle of the industry/company was not getting started. At that time, Appellant Manoj came there and asked why the vehicle was not taken by the deceased by pushing. The deceased replied that the vehicle needs self work. On this, Appellant Manoj abused the deceased in the name of his mother and sister and beat him also. On being demanded his labour wages by the deceased, Appellant Manoj refused to pay him the wages. The incident was witnessed by Chetan and Billu. It is alleged that bo












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top