RAM PRASANNA SHARMA
Sumitra Devi Saraf – Appellant
Versus
Vidyawati Saraff W – Respondent
RAM PRASANNA SHARMA, J.
1. This appeal is preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment/decree dated 12-5-2000 passed by the District Judge, Bilaspur, MP (Now CG) in Civil Suit No. 10-A/99 wherein the said court decreed the suit filed by the original respondent/plaintiff (present respondents No. A to F are legal representatives of deceased Lakahnlal) against the original appellant Motilal (present appellants are legal representatives of deceased Motilal) for eviction, injunction, compensation and vacant possession of the land bearing Survey No. 640 area 0.94 decimal situated at Juna Bilaspur, Kewat No. 202, Patwari Halka No. 110, Tahsil and District Bilaspur.
2. Admittedly, original respondent/plaintiff Lakhanlal and original appellant/defendant Motilal were real brothers and property in question is owned by Lakhanlal. As per version of original appellant/plaintiff, suit land was leased out on monthly rent of Rs. 100/- with permission to raise the structure in it in connection with his business for a period of 20 years expiring on 14-3-1985 to the original appellant by the original respondent. Before the expiry of the said lease anothe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.