1. Taking exception to the order granting interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1955”) this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner/wife questioning the quantum of maintenance granted to the extent of Rs. 11,000/- per month stating that the husband's income is more than Rs. 8 lacs per month, therefore, the quantum of interim maintenance be enhanced appropriately as per income of the respondent-husband by granting the writ petition.

2. Mr. Sourabh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner has stated the income of the respondent/husband to be more than Rs. 8 lacs per month, which the Family Court has ultimately recorded as Rs. 1,10,000/- per month, but only granted Rs. 11,000/- per month, which is contrary to the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court in the matters of Dr. Kulbhushan Kumar vs. Raj Kumari and Another, (1970) 3 SCC 129 and Kalyan Dey Chowdhury vs. Rita Devi Choudhery, (2017) 14 SCC 200. He would further submit that pathology labs are being run by the respondent/husband in different places. He would also submit that a Division Bench of this