JUDGMENT

Parth Prateem Sahu, J. - This petition has been filed challenging the action on the part of the 3rd respondent whereby the 3rd respondent has decided to retender the work as mentioned in NIT-513 for system tender No.61986 and NIT-518 for system tender No.63368 respectively vide Annexure P/1.

2. The facts relevant for disposal of this petition, are that, Respondent No.3 had issued tender notification bearing Nos. NIT513 for system tender No.61986 and NIT-518 for system tender No.63368 for construction and maintenance of rural road in Mungeli vide Package No.CG02-131 including 4 roads admeasuring 29.41 kms and construction and maintenance of rural road in Bilaspur/Takhatpur vide Package No.CG02-132 including 7 roads admeasuring 50.16 kms. respectively. The petitioner participated in the tender proceedings and submitted his bid for both the tender notifications. He became successful upon opening of his techno commercial bid and upon opening of the financial bid, he became L1 in both the tender proceedings upon amongst tenderers who participated and qualified in techno commercial bid. Subsequently, the petitioner was served with a letter on 08.06.2020 issued by the 3rd responde