JUDGMENT :

GOUTAM BHADURI, J.

1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 13.11.2020 (Annexure P-13) passed by the Revenue Board. Pursuant to a petition filed by the respondents No. 1 to 4 the division bench of this court by an order dated 13.09.2017 directed that the lis projected by the respondents No. 1 to 4 be decided by the Revenue Board in accordance with law within a specified time. Subsequently, pursuant to the order, the Revenue Board has passed the impugned order, which is subject of challenge.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that Dau Kalyan Singh was holding certain land at Raipur which was subject of ceiling cases and the ceiling cases were terminated after vesting of the excess land in the government. He would submit that after closure of the ceiling case it was never contested by the government. It is stated that Dau Kalyan Singh was having two co-widows namely Smt. Sarjawati Bai and Smt. Janak Nandini both of them died issue less and Sarjawati Bai gave a general power of attorney to one Ram Murty Agrawal in the year 1965 and a WILL was executed by Sarjawati in favour of Ram Murty Agrawal on 8.6.1970 and the registered WILL was executed in