IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JJ.
Dr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Chandra Shekhar Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 52 of 2020
Decided on : 07-05-2021
'Public Interest Litigation' – Land Scam - whether the land recorded in the name of Jail Department in revenue records, the Deputy Superintendent of Jail would be the competent authority to give his consent for exchanging of land with private person and whether proceedings drawn by Additional Collector in revenue case for exchange of land under the provisions of Revenue Book Circular are in accordance with law or not
Finding of the Court:
Allotment of land of Jail Department under exchange to private respondents, drawing proceedings by the competent authority but the proceeding to be irregular. After brining to the notice of the concerned department, the department had initiated some proceeding based on which authority who passed an order of exchange of land sought for review of the same which came to be rejected.
Respondents No. 3 and 4 are competent enough to protect their own interest by drawing appropriate proceedings. No public right is affected, no public interest is involved in writ petition, hence, we are refraining ourselves from entertaining the writ petition and deciding the ground raised on merit. The petition in its form is not maintainable, accordingly it is dismissed. It is made clear that we have considered only the maintainability of the public interest litigation in its from and have not considered the merits of the issue raised in this petition.
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner who is resident of Baikunthpur city has filed this 'Public Interest Litigation' ('PIL') stating the issue raised in the writ petition to be with regard to 'land scam' whereby respondent No.9 got transferred the land in his name, which was recorded in the name of Jail Department in proceedings of exchange of land in revenue case No.04/A-19(4)/2013-14 by Additional Collector, Baiknunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh without seeking consent of competent authority. The question involved in writ petition is whether the land recorded in the name of Jail Department in revenue records, the Deputy Superintendent of Jail would be the competent authority to give his consent for exchanging of land with private person and whether proceedings drawn by Additional Collector in revenue case for exchange of land under the provisions of Revenue Book Circular (for short 'RBC') are in accordance with law or not.
2. Relevant facts raised in this writ petition are that, land bearing Khasra Nos.252/1 and 298 are recorded in the name of Jail (Reserved for Jail). The land of aforesaid Khasra numbers lying adjacent to the present Jail was vacant and an open land. Other lands bearing Khasra Nos.149/1 and 153 situated at Jampara were also recorded in the name of Police Department. In part of these Khasra numbers 149/1 and 153, buildings of Police Department and residential quarters are constructed and large area of aforesaid Khasra numbers is undeveloped and is lying open. Respondents No.9 and 10 are (in the business of real estate), engaged in the business of developing and constructing residential colonies. The land which is subject matter of writ petition is adjacent to the colony developed by them known as 'Mangi Lal Agrawal Nagar' popularly called as 'MLA Nagar'. Respondents No.9 and 10 purchased land bearing Khasra No.252/1 situated at Patwari Halka No.5 from one Uday Pratap Singh. As per description mentioned in the sale deed executed by Uday Pratap Singh in favour of respondent No.10, east side of land is bounded by land belonging to Jail and other sides of the land is bounded by lands of private persons. Respondent No.9 after getting permission from the competent authority, started developing colony over the land situated at Khasra No.252/1. Respondent No.9 in view of extension of colony situated at Khasra No.252/1 has made an application for exchange of land bearing Khasra No.149/1 measuring 0.548 hectares and Khasra No.153 measuring 0.429 hectares (total area 0.977 hectares), with the land situated at Khasra No.295 recorded in the name of Jail, which is adjacent to the land bearing Khasra No.252/1 where respondent No.9 was developing colony. Application for exchange of land was filed on 22.08.2013 before the Additional Collector Baikunthpur. Upon receiving the application for exchange, Additional Collector issued public notice inviting objection. When no objection was received, he called for a report from Tahsildar. Upon receiving report of Tahsildar, value of the lands, sought to be exchanged has been ascertained from Deputy Registrar. No objection was sought from the Municipal Council who vide letter dated 08.11.2013 has stated that Khasra Nos.149/1 and 153 are occupied by the Police Department and Khasra No.295 is recorded as Government land. The Patwari Baikunthpur after inspection submitted its report that Khasra No.295 includes Khasra No.298/1 and both the lands are recorded and reserved in the name of Jail. The Collector passed an order permitting for exchange of land and directed for correction in the revenue records accordingly.
3. On 02.08.2017, Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services wrote a letter to Collector Koriya regarding illegal exchange of land of Jail Department. The Collector based on the letter had issued direction to Tahsildar to submit a report. The Tahsildar submitted report that land bearing Khasra Nos.295 and 298/1 is recorded in the name of Jail prior to Independence. Exchan
Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of W.B. reported in (2004) 3 SCC 349
Dr. B. Singh v. Union of India and Others reported in (2004) 3 SCC 363
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware v. State of Maharashtra and others reported in (2005) 1 SCC 590
Parkash Singh Badal and Another v. State of Punjab and Others reported in (2007) 1 SCC 1
Rajib Ranjan and Others v. R. Vijay Kumar reported in (2015) 1 SCC 513
Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal
Privy Council (arising out of land acquisition proceedings)
Hazara Singh Gill v. The State of Punjab reported in AIR 1965 SC 720
Nazir Ahmad v. King-Emperor reported in (1936) AIR (PC) 253
State of Orissa and Another v. Mamata Mohanty reported in (2011) 3 SCC 436
M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu and Others reported in (1999) 6 SCC 464
Noida Entrepreneurs Association v. Noida and Others reported in (2011) 6 SCC 508
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others reported in (1991) 1 SCC 598
State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal and Others reported in (2010) 3 SCC 402
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
Sachindanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal
Chhetriya Pardushan Mukti Sangharsh Samiti v. State of U.P.
Janata Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary and Others reported in (1992) 4 SCC 305
Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdulbhai
Ramjas Foundation v. Union of India
K.R. Srinivas v. R.M. Premchand
State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others reported in (2010) 3 SCC 402
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.