SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Chh) 200

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.
Sambhav Parakh S/o. Late Shri Rajesh Parakh & Ors. - Applicants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station City Kotwali, Raipur, Chhattisgarh - Respondent
MCRC Nos. 7850, 8037, 8231, 8260, 8267, 8604, 8649, 8658, 9511 of 2020
Decided On : 29-01-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Ms. Naushina Ali, Shri Manoj Paranjape, Shri Jitendra Gupta, Shri Shailendra Dubey & Ms Shivali Dubey, Shri Atanu Ghosh, Shri P.R. Patankar.
For the Respondent:Shri Ravish Verma, Govt. Advocate, Shri Mohd. Asrar Ali, ASI and Shri O.P. Sahu, ASI, Investigating Officers, Police Station City Kotawali, Raipur.

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22(c), 29, 25 & 27, Section 50 - Criminal Offence - Arrest - Two accused were raided - They were searched in which illicit possession of 7 gms. Cocaine and 10 gms. of cocaine was found - Applicants preferred these bail applications under Section 439 of CrPC, as they are arrested in connection with Crime - Whether bail application can be granted - Held, It would not tantamount to filling in the lacunae if the Chemical Analyser had made appropriate notes while conducting such tests - Having considered the entire facts situation of the case, the violations for which the charge sheet has been filed and the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court and different High Courts on the issue which has fallen for consideration - Considering entire facts situation of the case and particularly considering the seriousness of the offence and the nature of evidence available on record - Bail applications are rejected.

ORDER :

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

1. Since all the bail applications are arising out of crime No.255/2020 they are being considered and decided by this common order.

2. The applicants have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 of CrPC, as they are arrested in connection with Crime No.255/2020, registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Raipur (CG), for the offence punishable under Sections 22(c), 29, 25 & 27 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the Act’). [As per the final report].

3. As per the prosecution case a secret information was received by the Police of Police Station City Kotwali, Raipur, that the accused Shreyansh Jhabak and Vikas Banchore are moving to sell cocaine near Government Polytechnic, Byron Bazar, Raipur. After taking down the information in the Rojnamcha Sanha; preparing mukhbir panchnama; and informing the City Superintendent of Police, ASI Mohd. Asrar Ali with Constable Kumar Gaurav Patel & Girdhar Prajapati reached the place of occurrence and having found the above two accused they were raided and after making necessary compliance of provisions of Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act') they were searched in which Shreyansh Jhabak was found in illicit possession of 7 gms. cocaine whereas Vikas Banchore was found in illicit possession of 10 gms. of cocaine, which were kept wrapped in polythene sheet in their trouser pocket. The seizure memos were prepared and the seized cocaine was weighed in the electronic weighing machine. During interrogation and verification of their mobile phones and call details it was found that the accused persons are part of drug cartel/mafia who are engaged in the illicit trade and trafficking of cocaine and MDMA [Methylene-dioxy-methamphetamine] throughout the country including in several districts of the Chhattisgarh State.

4. Based on the information, accused Abhishek Shukla was arrested and from his possession 93.610 gms. MDMA was recovered. The total quantity being 110.610 gms., more than the commercial quantity (100 gms.). The investigation further proceeded for offence under Section 22(c) instead of Section 22(b) of the Act. During further investigation it was revealed to the police that the co-accused Abdul Azim, Mohammad Minhaz, Rohiz Ahuja, Laxman Gain, Rakesh Arora, Allen Soren, Gaurav Shukla, Ashish Joshi, Nikita Panchal, Sambhav Parak, Harshdeep Singh Juneja & Royden Buthello are also involved in illicit trade and trafficking including sell, transportation and possession as also consumption of cocaine and MDMA. The illicit drugs were brought to Raipur from Mumbai & Goa and consumed at the drugs party by the accused persons and is also sold to other intending customers. Police has recorded the statements of witnesses to the search and seizure operation; disclosure statements of accused persons; and diary statements of other witnesses. They are: Shiva Mudaliyar, Prakash Harpal, Kewal Barmeda, Avinash Shukla, Dashmit Chawla, Mayank Agrawal & Har Kiran Kaur. Statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. have also been recorded of the witnesses Dashmit Chawla & Avinash Shukla.

5. Learned counsels appearing for the applicants would argue that more than the small quantity, but less than the commercial quantity of contraband has been seized from Shreyansh Jhabak, therefore, the provisions contained in Section 37 of the Act concerning limitation on granting bail would not attract and the applicant having remained in jail for more than three months is entitled to be released on bail. For other accused persons, learned counsels would further argue that no seizure has been made from them and they have been arrested only on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused or by witnesses and, as such, they are entitled to be released on bail. Learned counsels would also argue that mandatory provisions contained in Sections 42 & 50 of the Act having not been complied with, therefore, this also en

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top