P.SAM KOSHY
Narad Tamrakar S/o Late Shri Mohar Sai Tamrakar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Aggrieved by the decision of the respondents in initiating a disciplinary proceedings and also ordering for conducting of a departmental inquiry the present writ petition has been filed.
2. The brief facts relevant for the adjudication of the present writ petition is that the petitioner is working under the respondents as a Constable (Trade). On 16.03.2020 an F.I.R. was lodged against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 506 & 509 (B) of Indian Penal Code and Section 67(A) of the I.T. Act. Subsequently, the matter has been put to trial and the charge-sheet also has been filed before the concerned trial Court. Now the Department has vide charge-sheet dated 05.03.2021 (Annexure P/3)) has been issued.
3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that perusal of the contents of the charge-sheet and on perusal of the allegations leveled in the F.I.R., the contents are same. He further drew the attention of this Court to the list of witnesses cited in the criminal case as also in the departmental enquiry and submitted that the main witnesses before the two proceedings also are the same. According to the petitioner, since in the departmental enquiry the witnesses
Avinash Sadashiv Bhosle (Died) through LRs. vs. Union of India (2012) 13 SCC 142
Capt. M. Paul Anthony V. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. And Anr. 1999 3 SCC 679
State Bank of India & Ors. vs. Neelam Nag and Others 2016 9 SCC 491
Stanzen Toyotetsu India Private Limited vs. Girish V. & Ors (2014) 3 SCC 636
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.