Lakhan Bandra @ Sarjom S/o Shri Vijay Bandra vs State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Chh) 365

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL, SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT
Lakhan Bandra @ Sarjom S/o Shri Vijay Bandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rishi Rahul Soni.
For the Respondents: Sudeep Verma, Anmol Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.

1. This criminal appeal preferred by the appellant herein under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.10.2017 passed by the learned Second Special Judge (POCSO), Raigarh, in POCSO Act 2012/18/2016, by which the learned Special Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellant in the following manner:

Conviction	Sentence
Section 363 of the IPC	RI for three years and fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, additional RI for six months.
Section 370(5)/34 of the IPC	Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default, additional RI for one year.
Section 374/34 of the IPC	RI for six months and fine of Rs. 500/- in default, RI for one month.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 6-7 months before 21.1.2016 the appellant took victim No. 1/(PW-5) (daughter of Surender Gagrai) from Kirodimal Nagar, Raigarh to Delhi by practicing fraud, deception and inducement and she was sold to co-accused Champai Munda and thereafter co-accused Champ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Chh) 365

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL, SACHIN SINGH RAJPUTLakhan Bandra @ Sarjom S/o Shri Vijay Bandra – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL, SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT
Lakhan Bandra @ Sarjom S/o Shri Vijay Bandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent