SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 473

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
Gudda @ Ravishankar Panday, S/o. Tulsi Ram Panday - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 2012
Decided On : 13-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Mahendra Dubey.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sudeep Verma, Mr. Soumya Rai.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 374(2) - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 25 – Offence of Murder – Charged - Marriage of deceased was solemnized with the appellant Gudda @ Ravishankar Pandey on 29/04/2004 - After marriage, deceased used to have chest pain and for treatment she used to visit her parental home frequently - On, deceased had suffered 90% burn injuries and she was escorted to Baikunthpur Hospital - After being informed by Hospital, Rampratap Sahu (Ex. P/43), working as A.S.I. at Police Station, wrote a letter (Ex. P/39) to Assistant Surgeon, Community Health Center, Baikunthpur for conducting medical examination of the deceased and also wrote a letter to Executive Magistrate for recording dying declaration of deceased - Thereafter, again, dying declaration of deceased was recorded by Tahsildar, Ambikapur namely Rajesh Sahi (D.W.-2) after being certified by Doctor that deceased was in proper condition to give her statement - Deceased again stated that some unknown person poured kerosene oil over her and set her on fire - Deceased ultimately succumbed to death having suffered severe burn injuries - Whether death of deceased Smt. Prabha Pandey was homicidal in nature ? - Whether appellant is the author of crime in question and he has caused death of his wife Smt. Prabha Pandey after pouring kerosene oil over her body and setting her on fire ? - Held, trial Court has relied upon Ex. P/2 as one of incriminating circumstances against appellant herein - Said document, Ex. P/2, is a panchnama statement of appellant made before S.H.O. (P.W.- 44) i.e. after more than 20 months from date of incident, in which he has allegedly confessed that he has caused death of his wife Smt. Prabha Pandey - Strong reliance has been placed by the trial Court upon this document (Ex. P/2) for convicting appellant for aforesaid offence - Court are of opinion that prosecution has utterly and miserably failed to establish that death of deceased Smt. Prabha Pandey was homicidal in nature and further failed to establish that appellant is author of crime in view of fact that deceased had given dying declaration (Ex. D/2 and D/2A) in which she has clearly not named appellant to be author of the crime in question - Moreover, oral dying declaration allegedly made by deceased before her mother (P.W.-38) and father (P.W.-39) is a weak kind of evidence and it cannot be relied upon to convict appellant herein for reasons recorded herein-above - Furthermore, Ex. P/2, which is panchnama statement of appellant, is hit by Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Criminal appeal stands allowed.

JUDGMENT :

[Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.]

1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of CrPC has been preferred by the appellant herein assailing the impugned judgment dated 05/01/2012 (Annexure A/1) passed by the Sessios Judge Koriya (Baikunthpur) Distt. Koriya in Sessions Trial No. 62/2007 whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine additional R.I. for three months.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 08/04/2022 at about 05:30 PM, the appellant herein, with the intention of causing death of his wife Smt. Prabha Pandey, poured kerosene oil over her and set her on fire due to which she received 90% burn injuries and ultimately, succumbed to death on 15/04/2022.

3. Further case of the prosecution is that marriage of deceased Smt. Prabha Pandey was solemnized with the appellant Gudda @ Ravishankar Pandey on 29/04/2004 at Ramgarh. After marriage, the deceased used to have chest pain and for treatment she used to visit her parental home frequently. On 08/04/2005, the deceased had suffered 90% burn injuries and she was escorted to Baikunthpur Hospital. After being informed by the Hospital, Rampratap Sahu (Ex. P/43), working as A.S.I. at Police Station Baikunthpur, wrote a letter (Ex. P/39) to the Assistant Surgeon, Community Health Center, Baikunthpur for conducting medical examination of the deceased and also wrote a letter to the Executive Magistrate for recording dying declaration of the deceased. MLC was conducted by Dr. Rameshwar Sharma (P.W.-48) vide Ex. P/51 wherein he found that the deceased was in a serious condition and she had suffered 90% burns and thereafter, he wrote a letter to the T.I. vide Ex. P/50 informing him about the condition of the deceased and for recording her dying declaration pursuant to which her dying declaration was recorded on 08/04/2005 at 08:10 PM vide Ex. D/2 in the presence of Naib Tahsildar, Baikunthpur namely S.R. Sidar (D.W.-1) wherein the deceased had informed that some unknown person poured kerosene oil on her body and set her on fire. Thereafter, on being referred from Baikunthpur Hospital, the deceased was admitted to Holy Cross Hospital, Ambikapur on 09/04/2005 at about 5 PM wherein she was examined by Dr. Rachna (P.W.-52). Thereafter, again on 10/04/2005 at 07:30 PM, dying declaration of the deceased was recorded by Tahsildar, Ambikapur namely Rajesh Sahi (D.W.-2) after being certified by the Doctor that deceased was in proper condition to give her statement. The deceased again stated that some unknown person poured kerosene oil over her and set her on fire. Thereafter, on 15/04/2022, the deceased ultimately succumbed to death having suffered severe burn injuries. After being informed by the Hospital, Merg No. 0/05 was registered vide Ex. P/30 by Police Station Gandhinagar and thereafter, merg No. 19/05 was recorded by Police Station Patna vide Ex. P/38 and first information report was recorded for offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC vide Ex. P/53 and the wheels of investigation started running. Spot map was prepared vide Ex. P/31 and summons were issued to the witnesses vide Ex. P/32. In the presence of the witnesses, inquest was conducted vide Ex. P/33 and the dead body of deceased was subjected to postmortem, which was conducted by Dr. Faizal H. Firdausi (P.W.-50) and he has opined in the postmortem report (Ex. P/52) that cause of death is due to the effect of septic absorption from the infected ulcers from burn injuries. Statements of prime witnesses namely Smt. Phulkunver (P.W.-23), Phulbai (P.W.-24), Devpratap Singh (P.W.-25), Keshlal Singh (P.W.-26), Vijay Kumar Jaiswal (P.W.-27), Smt. Fulmatiya (P.W.-30), Smt. Poonam Mishra (P.W.-38) and Swatantra Kumar Mishra (P.W.-39) were recorded from 08/01/2007 to 12/05/2007 after conclusion of merg inquiry before whom the deceased had allegedly given oral dying declaration stating that i

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top